Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 May 23;16(11):1583.
doi: 10.3390/nu16111583.

Broccoli Consumption and Risk of Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Broccoli Consumption and Risk of Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Eduard Baladia et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Background: The scientific literature has reported an inverse association between broccoli consumption and the risk of suffering from several types of cancer; however, the results were not entirely consistent across studies. A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies were conducted to determine the association between broccoli consumption and cancer risk with the aim of clarifying the beneficial biological effects of broccoli consumption on cancer.

Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), and Epistemonikos databases were searched to identify all published papers that evaluate the impact of broccoli consumption on the risk of cancer. Citation chasing of included studies was conducted as a complementary search strategy. The risk of bias in individual studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects model meta-analysis was employed to quantitatively synthesize results, with the I2 index used to assess heterogeneity.

Results: Twenty-three case-control studies (n = 12,929 cases and 18,363 controls; n = 31,292 individuals) and 12 cohort studies (n = 699,482 individuals) were included in the meta-analysis. The results suggest an inverse association between broccoli consumption and the risk of cancer both in case-control studies (OR: 0.64, 95% CI from 0.58 to 0.70, p < 0.001; Q = 35.97, p = 0.072, I2 = 30.49%-moderate heterogeneity; τ2 = 0.016) and cohort studies (RR: 0.89, 95% CI from 0.82 to 0.96, p = 0.003; Q = 13.51, p = 0.333, I2 = 11.21%-low heterogeneity; τ2 = 0.002). Subgroup analysis suggested a potential benefit of broccoli consumption in site-specific cancers only in case-control studies.

Conclusions: In summary, the findings indicate that individuals suffering from some type of cancer consumed less broccoli, suggesting a protective biological effect of broccoli on cancer. More studies, especially cohort studies, are necessary to clarify the possible beneficial effect of broccoli on several types of cancer.

Keywords: anticancer agent; cancer prevention; chemopreventive; cruciferous vegetables; epidemiological studies; sulforaphane.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the article selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Results of the meta-analysis of case–control studies [39,40,41,42,44,45,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Results of the meta-analysis of cohort studies [37,38,43,55,56,57,59,62,63,64,65,66].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Begg’s funnel plots of case–control (A) and cohort (B) studies.

References

    1. Dagenais G.R., Leong D.P., Rangarajan S., Lanas F., Lopez-Jaramillo P., Gupta R., Diaz R., Avezum A., Oliveira G.B.F., Wielgosz A., et al. Variations in common diseases, hospital admissions, and deaths in middle-aged adults in 21 countries from five continents (PURE): A prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:785–794. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32007-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J., Laversanne M., Ervik M., Lam F., Colombet M., Mery L., Piñeros M., Znaor A., Soerjomataram I., Bray F. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Tomorrow (Version 1.1) International Agency for Research on Cancer; Lyon, France: 2024.
    1. Cronin K.A., Scott S., Firth A.U., Sung H., Henley S.J., Sherman R.L., Siegel R.L., Anderson R.N., Kohler B.A., Benard V.B., et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part 1: National cancer statistics. Cancer. 2022;128:4251–4284. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34479. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weeden C.E., Hill W., Lim E.L., Gronroos E., Swanton C. Impact of risk factors on early cancer evolution. Cell. 2023;186:1541–1563. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.03.013. - DOI - PubMed