Management of Pediatric Superficial Partial-Thickness Burns with Polyhexamethylene Biguanide: Outcomes and Influencing Factors
- PMID: 38892785
- PMCID: PMC11173300
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113074
Management of Pediatric Superficial Partial-Thickness Burns with Polyhexamethylene Biguanide: Outcomes and Influencing Factors
Abstract
Background: In burn care, achieving swift healing with minimal complications remains paramount. This investigation assesses the role of polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) in managing pediatric superficial partial-thickness burns, focusing on the effects of various patient-specific factors on recovery. Methods: Through a retrospective analysis of 27 pediatric cases treated with PHMB, we evaluated the impact of age, burn size, dressing frequency, treatment delay, cold therapy application, and analgesic usage on the time until reepithelialization (TTRE). Results: The majority of patients benefited from early cold therapy, yet only 1 in 3 patients received analgesics. A mean healing time of 8.78 (SD: 2.64) days was observed, with the extent of the burn showing a strong correlation (r: 0.63) to TTRE. Most treatments were managed outpatient, evidenced by a negligible average hospital stay (0.96 days), with recorded no complications. Conclusions: Our findings endorse PHMB as a promising treatment for superficial second-degree burns in young patients, due to the observed stable and rapid wound closure without the association of increased risks. Continued exploration into the optimal application of prehospital interventions and the comprehensive benefits of PHMB in pediatric burn management is necessary. Future research should assess long-term outcomes, including functionality, scar quality, and patient satisfaction.
Keywords: PHMB; Polyhexamethylen Biguanide; Polyhexanide; burn; child; partial-thickness; pediatric; second-degree.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Use of a copolymer dressing on superficial and partial-thickness burns in a paediatric population.J Wound Care. 2015 Jul;24(7):S4-8. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.Sup7.S4. J Wound Care. 2015. PMID: 26198721
-
Negative pressure dressing assisted healing in pediatric burn patients.J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Jul;49(7):1142-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.02.040. Epub 2014 Feb 17. J Pediatr Surg. 2014. PMID: 24952804
-
Safety and effectiveness of an antiseptic wound cleansing and irrigation solution containing polyhexamethylene biguanide.J Wound Care. 2024 May 2;33(5):324-334. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2024.33.5.324. J Wound Care. 2024. PMID: 38683774
-
Topical treatment for facial burns.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 29;7(7):CD008058. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008058.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32725896 Free PMC article.
-
Preliminary results in single-step wound closure procedure of full-thickness facial burns in children by using the collagen-elastin matrix and review of pediatric facial burns.Burns. 2015 Sep;41(6):1268-74. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Feb 21. Burns. 2015. PMID: 25716758 Review.
Cited by
-
Smart Thermoresponsive Sol-Gel Formulation of Polyhexanide for Rapid and Painless Burn and Wound Management.Polymers (Basel). 2025 Jul 30;17(15):2079. doi: 10.3390/polym17152079. Polymers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40808127 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Schaefer T.J., Szymanski K.D. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2023. Burn Evaluation and Management. - PubMed
-
- Patel K., Rodríguez-Mercedes S., Grant G., Rencken C., Kinney E., Austen A., Hou C., Brady K., Schneider J., Kazis L., et al. Physical, Psychological, and Social Outcomes in Pediatric Burn Survivors Ages 5 to 18 Years: A Systematic Review. J. Burn Care Res. 2021;43:343–352. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab225. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources