Associations between Clinicopathological Characteristics and Intraoperative Opioid Requirements during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection with Monitored Anesthesia Care: A Retrospective Study
- PMID: 38892830
- PMCID: PMC11172858
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113119
Associations between Clinicopathological Characteristics and Intraoperative Opioid Requirements during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection with Monitored Anesthesia Care: A Retrospective Study
Abstract
Background and study aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection is used to treat early gastric neoplasms. Compared with other endoscopic procedures, it requires higher doses of opioids, leading to adverse events during monitored anesthesia care. We investigated the correlations between clinicopathological characteristics and intraprocedural opioid requirements in patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection under monitored anesthesia care. Patients and methods: The medical records of patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection under monitored anesthesia care were retrospectively reviewed. The dependent variable was the total dose of fentanyl administered during the dissection, while independent variables were patient demographics, the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, preoperative vital sign data, and the pathological characteristics of the neoplasm. Correlations between variables were examined using multiple regression analysis. Results: The study included 743 patients. The median total fentanyl dose was 100 mcg. Younger age (coefficient -1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.78 to -0.95), male sex (16.12; 95% CI 6.99-25.24), baseline diastolic blood pressure (0.44; 95% CI 0.04-0.85), neoplasm length (1.63; 95% CI 0.90-2.36), and fibrosis (28.59; 95% CI 17.77-39.42) were positively correlated with the total fentanyl dose. Total fentanyl dose was higher in the differentiated (16.37; 95% CI 6.40-26.35) and undifferentiated cancers group (32.53; 95% CI 16.95-48.11) than in the dysplasia group; no significant differences were observed among the others. The mid-anterior wall (22.69; 95% CI 1.25-44.13), mid-posterior wall (29.65; 95% CI 14.39-44.91), mid-greater curvature (28.77; 95% CI 8.56-48.98), and upper groups (30.06; 95% CI 5.01-55.12) had higher total fentanyl doses than the lower group, whereas doses did not significantly differ for the mid-lesser curvature group. Conclusions: We identified variables that influenced opioid requirements during monitored anesthesia care for endoscopic submucosal dissection. These may help predict the needed opioid doses and identify factors affecting intraprocedural opioid requirements.
Keywords: endoscopic submucosal dissection; gastric cancer; monitored anesthesia care; opioid.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Risk factors associated with surveillance loss after endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with gastric neoplasm.Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jul;9(14):1127. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-891. Ann Transl Med. 2021. PMID: 34430568 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Outcomes and Adverse Events of Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of the Mid to Upper Stomach under General Anesthesia and Monitored Anesthetic Care.Clin Endosc. 2022 Jan;55(1):77-85. doi: 10.5946/ce.2021.002. Epub 2021 Jul 5. Clin Endosc. 2022. PMID: 34224661 Free PMC article.
-
A multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for large lesser gastric curvature superficial neoplasms.Surg Endosc. 2019 Jun;33(6):1910-1919. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6471-y. Epub 2018 Sep 27. Surg Endosc. 2019. PMID: 30264277
-
AGA Institute Clinical Practice Update: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the United States.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(1):16-25.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.041. Epub 2018 Aug 2. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019. PMID: 30077787 Review.
-
Endoscopic causes and characteristics of missed gastric cancers after endoscopic submucosal dissection.Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Nov;98(5):735-743.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.02.024. Epub 2023 Feb 25. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023. PMID: 36849058 Review.
Cited by
-
Determining ED90 of Flumazenil for Selective Respiratory Distress Improvement Using Remimazolam During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric Neoplasms: A Prospective Study.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 20;17(2):321. doi: 10.3390/cancers17020321. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39858103 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tanabe S., Ishido K., Higuchi K., Sasaki T., Katada C., Azuma M., Naruke A., Kim M., Koizumi W. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: A retrospective comparison with conventional endoscopic resection in a single center. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17:130–136. doi: 10.1007/s10120-013-0241-2. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Soto R.G., Fu E.S., Smith R.A., Miguel R.V. Bispectral Index® and the incidence of apnea during monitored anesthesia care. Ambul. Surg. 2005;12:81–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ambsur.2005.08.001. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources