Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 27;13(11):3134.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13113134.

Wearable Sensors in Other Medical Domains with Application Potential for Orthopedic Trauma Surgery-A Narrative Review

Affiliations
Review

Wearable Sensors in Other Medical Domains with Application Potential for Orthopedic Trauma Surgery-A Narrative Review

Carolina Vogel et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

The use of wearable technology is steadily increasing. In orthopedic trauma surgery, where the musculoskeletal system is directly affected, focus has been directed towards assessing aspects of physical functioning, activity behavior, and mobility/disability. This includes sensors and algorithms to monitor real-world walking speed, daily step counts, ground reaction forces, or range of motion. Several specific reviews have focused on this domain. In other medical fields, wearable sensors and algorithms to monitor digital biometrics have been used with a focus on domain-specific health aspects such as heart rate, sleep, blood oxygen saturation, or fall risk. This review explores the most common clinical and research use cases of wearable sensors in other medical domains and, from it, derives suggestions for the meaningful transfer and application in an orthopedic trauma context.

Keywords: body worn sensor; digital; orthopedic surgery; outcome assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

B.J.B. and B.G. are on the advisory board of BIOS Medical AG. S.Y. is advisor to Arthrex, Inc. and Restor3D. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphical representation of principal outcome assessed in other fields with application in trauma in relation to the most commonly reported sensor positions (body-worn wearable, left; smartphone, top right; shoe insole, bottom right). Superscript numbers refer to exemplary literature. Graphic created with the help of DALL-E3.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Piwek L., Ellis D.A., Andrews S., Joinson A. The Rise of Consumer Health Wearables: Promises and Barriers. PLoS Med. 2016;13:e1001953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001953. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu F., Panagiotakos D. Real-World Data: A Brief Review of the Methods, Applications, Challenges and Opportunities. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2022;22:287. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01768-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xintarakou A., Sousonis V., Asvestas D., Vardas P.E., Tzeis S. Remote Cardiac Rhythm Monitoring in the Era of Smart Wearables: Present Assets and Future Perspectives. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022;9:853614. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.853614. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li X., Dunn J., Salins D., Zhou G., Zhou W., Rose S.M.S.-F., Perelman D., Colbert E., Runge R., Rego S., et al. Digital Health: Tracking Physiomes and Activity Using Wearable Biosensors Reveals Useful Health-Related Information. PLoS Biol. 2017;15:e2001402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001402. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Halm-Pozniak A., Lohmann C.H., Zagra L., Braun B., Gordon M., Grimm B. Best Practice in Digital Orthopaedics. EFORT Open Rev. 2023;8:283–290. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0081. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources