Loco-Regional Anesthesia for Pain Management in Robotic Thoracic Surgery
- PMID: 38892852
- PMCID: PMC11172511
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113141
Loco-Regional Anesthesia for Pain Management in Robotic Thoracic Surgery
Abstract
Robotic thoracic surgery is a prominent minimally invasive approach for the treatment of various thoracic diseases. While this technique offers numerous benefits including reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and less postoperative pain, effective pain management remains crucial to enhance recovery and minimize complications. This review focuses on the application of various loco-regional anesthesia techniques in robotic thoracic surgery, particularly emphasizing their role in pain management. Techniques such as local infiltration anesthesia (LIA), thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA), paravertebral block (PVB), intercostal nerve block (INB), and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) are explored in detail regarding their methodologies, benefits, and potential limitations. The review also discusses the imperative of integrating these anesthesia methods with robotic surgery to optimize patient outcomes. The findings suggest that while each technique has unique advantages, the choice of anesthesia should be tailored to the patient's clinical status, the complexity of the surgery, and the specific requirements of robotic thoracic procedures. The review concludes that a multimodal analgesia strategy, potentially incorporating several of these techniques, may offer the most effective approach for managing perioperative pain in robotic thoracic surgery. Future directions include refining these techniques through technological advancements like ultrasound guidance and exploring the long-term impacts of loco-regional anesthesia on patient recovery and surgical outcomes in the context of robotic thoracic surgery.
Keywords: block; epidural; erector spinae plane; intercostal; local anesthesia; myasthenia gravis; paravertebral; thoracic surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Recent Advances in Perioperative Analgesia in Thoracic Surgery: A Narrative Review.J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 25;14(1):38. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010038. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39797121 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of Postoperative Opioid Consumption of Paravertebral Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block After Thoracotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Cureus. 2024 May 1;16(5):e59459. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59459. eCollection 2024 May. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38826942 Free PMC article.
-
Continuous erector spinae plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia in video-assisted thoracic surgery: a study protocol for a prospective randomized open label non-inferiority trial.Trials. 2021 May 4;22(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05275-9. Trials. 2021. PMID: 33947442 Free PMC article.
-
Postoperative analgesic effects of paravertebral block versus erector spinae plane block for thoracic and breast surgery: A meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2021 Aug 25;16(8):e0256611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256611. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34432822 Free PMC article.
-
Paravertebral Block for Thoracic Surgery.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Apr;32(2):915-927. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 4. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018. PMID: 29169795 Review.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. Conventional Pain Treatment Strategies in Thoracic Surgery.J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 22;14(9):2870. doi: 10.3390/jcm14092870. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40363902 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sicolo E., Zirafa C.C., Romano G., Brandolini J., De Palma A., Bongiolatti S., Gallina F.T., Ricciardi S., Maestri M., Guida M., et al. National Multicenter Study on the Comparison of Robotic and Open Thymectomy for Thymic Neoplasms in Myasthenic Patients: Surgical, Neurological and Oncological Outcomes. Cancers. 2024;16:406. doi: 10.3390/cancers16020406. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources