Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 29;29(11):2550.
doi: 10.3390/molecules29112550.

O-Phthalaldehyde Derivatization for the Paper-Based Fluorometric Determination of Glutathione in Nutritional Supplements

Affiliations

O-Phthalaldehyde Derivatization for the Paper-Based Fluorometric Determination of Glutathione in Nutritional Supplements

Maria Tarara et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

Herein, a new, direct paper-based fluorimetric method is described for the quantitative determination of glutathione (GSH) molecules in nutritional supplements. Briefly, the proposed analytical method is based on the fluorescence emission resulting from the direct and selective chemical reaction of GSH molecules with the derivatization reagent that is o-phthalaldehyde (OPA) in acidic conditions at room temperature. The intensity of the emitted fluorescence on the surface of the analytical paper devices after irradiation with a lamp at 365 nm is proportional to the concentration of GSH and is measured using a smartphone as the detector. This methodology, which is suitable for measurements in laboratories with limited resources, does not require specialized instrumentation or trained personnel. The protocol governing the proposed method is simple and easily applicable. Essentially, the chemical analyst should adjust the value of pH on the surface of the paper by adding a minimal amount of buffer solution; then, after adding a few microliters of the derivatization reagent, wait for the surface of the paper to dry and, finally, add the analyte. Subsequently, the irradiation of the sensor and the measurement of the emitted fluorescence can be recorded with a mobile phone. In the present study, several parameters affecting the chemical reaction and the emitted fluorescence were optimized, the effect of interfering compounds that may be present in dietary supplements was examined, and the stability of these paper sensors under different storage conditions was evaluated. Additionally, the chemical stability of these paper devices in various maintenance conditions was studied, with satisfactory results. The detection limit calculated as 3.3 S/N was 20.5 μmol L-1, while the precision of the method was satisfactory, ranging from 3.1% (intra-day) to 7.3% (inter-day). Finally, the method was successfully applied to three different samples of dietary supplements.

Keywords: UV irradiation; fluorimetric determination; glutathione; nutritional supplement formulations; paper-based analytical devices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Optimization of (a) OPA concentration (pH 12, buffer concentration 100 mM, irradiation distance 11.5 cm), (b) pH (OPA 15 mM, buffer concentration 100 mM, irradiation distance 11.5 cm), (c) buffer concentration (OPA 15 mM, pH 11, irradiation distance 11.5 cm), and (d) irradiation distance (OPA 15 mM, pH 11, buffer concentration 100 mM). Error bars are the standard deviation for n = 3.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Optimization of reaction time (OPA concentration 15 mM, buffer pH 11, buffer concentration 100 mM, irradiation distance 11.5 cm). Error bars are the standard deviation for n = 3.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The “cumulative” calibration curve of the proposed method. Error bars are standard deviation for n = 3.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Selectivity study of the OPA-GSH reaction under the optimum experimental conditions (GSH 350 μM, OPA 15 mM, irradiation distance 11.5 cm, reaction time 10 min, buffer pH 11, and buffer concentration 100 mM). Error bars are the standard deviation for n = 3.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The experimental course of the method.

Similar articles

References

    1. Noctor G., Mhamdi A., Chaouch S., Han Y., Neukermans J., Marquez-Garcia B., Queval G., Foyer C.H. Glutathione in plants: An integrated overview. Plant Cell Environ. 2012;35:454–484. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02400.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu G., Lupton J.R., Turner N.D., Fang Y.-Z., Yang S. Glutathione metabolism and its implications for health. J. Nutr. 2004;134:489–492. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.3.489. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Richie J.P., Jr., Skowronski L., Abraham P., Leutzinger Y. Blood glutathione concentrations in a large-scale human study. Clin. Chem. 1996;42:64–70. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/42.1.64. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Minich D.M., Brown B.I. A review of dietary (phyto)nutrients for glutathione support. Nutrients. 2019;11:2073. doi: 10.3390/nu11092073. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kanďár R., Vrbová M., Čandová J. An assay of total glutathione and glutathione disulfide in human whole blood and plasma using a high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat Technol. 2013;36:2013–2028. doi: 10.1080/10826076.2012.706858. - DOI