Digital Mammography (DM) vs. Dynamic Contrast Enhancement-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) in Microcalcifications Assessment: A Radiological-Pathological Comparison
- PMID: 38893590
- PMCID: PMC11172046
- DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14111063
Digital Mammography (DM) vs. Dynamic Contrast Enhancement-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) in Microcalcifications Assessment: A Radiological-Pathological Comparison
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics of breast microcalcification on digital mammography (DM) with the histological and molecular subtypes of breast cancer and to identify the predictive value of DM and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in assessing microcalcifications for radiologic-pathologic correlation. We relied on our prospectively maintained database of suspicious microcalcifications on DM, from which data were retrospectively collected between January 2020 and April 2023. We enrolled 158 patients, all of whom were subjected to biopsy. Additionally, 63 patients underwent breast DCE-MRI. Microcalcifications with a linear branched morphology were correlated with malignancies (p < 0.001), among which an association was highlighted between triple negatives (TNs) and segmental distribution (p < 0.001). Amorphous calcifications were correlated with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) (p = 0.013), coarse heterogeneous (p < 0.001), and fine-pleomorphic (p = 0.008) with atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) and fine pleomorphic (p = 0.009) with flat epithelial atypia (FEA). Regarding DCE-MRI, no statistical significance was observed between non-mass lesions and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Concerning mass lesions, three were identified as DCIS and five as invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). In conclusion, microcalcifications assessed in DM exhibit promising predictive characteristics concerning breast lesion subtypes, leading to a reduction in diagnostic times and further examination costs, thereby enhancing the clinical management of patients.
Keywords: DCE-MRI; breast cancer; breast microcalcifications; digital mammography; radiologic–pathologic correlation.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
The value of MRI contrast enhancement in biopsy decision of suspicious mammographic microcalcifications: a prospective multicenter study.Eur Radiol. 2021 Mar;31(3):1718-1726. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07265-y. Epub 2020 Sep 16. Eur Radiol. 2021. PMID: 32939619
-
Atypical ductal hyperplasia: breast DCE-MRI can be used to reduce unnecessary open surgical excision.Eur Radiol. 2020 Jul;30(7):4069-4081. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06701-3. Epub 2020 Mar 7. Eur Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32144463
-
Breast Suspicious Microcalcifications on Contrast-Enhanced Mammograms: Practice and Reflection.Int J Gen Med. 2025 Jan 17;18:273-280. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S494188. eCollection 2025. Int J Gen Med. 2025. PMID: 39839240 Free PMC article.
-
Positive predictive value for malignancy of uncertain malignant potential (B3) breast lesions diagnosed on vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB): is surgical excision still recommended?Eur Radiol. 2021 Feb;31(2):920-927. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07161-5. Epub 2020 Aug 20. Eur Radiol. 2021. PMID: 32816199 Review.
-
Upgrade rates of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed on core needle biopsy: a single-institution experience and literature review.Mod Pathol. 2016 Dec;29(12):1471-1484. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.127. Epub 2016 Aug 19. Mod Pathol. 2016. PMID: 27538687 Review.
References
-
- D’Orsi: Acr BI-rAdS® Atlas—Google Scholar. [(accessed on 29 November 2023)]. Available online: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=ACR%20BI-RADS%20Atlas%2C....
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous