Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct;205(4):1346-1355.
doi: 10.1111/bjh.19589. Epub 2024 Jun 18.

Serum mass spectrometry for treatment monitoring in patients with multiple myeloma receiving ARI0002h CAR T-cells

Affiliations

Serum mass spectrometry for treatment monitoring in patients with multiple myeloma receiving ARI0002h CAR T-cells

Iñaki Ortiz de Landazuri et al. Br J Haematol. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have increased the patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in whom standard electrophoretic techniques fail to detect the M-protein. Quantitative immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry (QIP-MS) can accurately measure serum M-protein with high sensitivity, and identify interferences caused by therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Here, we investigate the outcome of QIP-MS in 33 patients treated with the academic BCMA-directed CAR T-cell ARI0002h (Cesnicabtagene Autoleucel). QIP-MS offered more detailed insights than serum immunofixation (sIFE), identifying glycosylated M-proteins and minor additional peaks. Moreover, the potential interferences owing to daratumumab or tocilizumab treatments were successfully detected. When analysing different assay platforms during patient's monitoring after ARI0002h administration, we observed that QIP-MS showed a high global concordance (78.8%) with sIFE, whereas it was only moderate (55.6%) with bone marrow (BM)-based next-generation flow cytometry (NGF). Furthermore, QIP-MS consistently demonstrated the lowest negativity rate across the different timepoints (27.3% vs. 60.0% in months 1 and 12, respectively). Patients with QIP-MS(+)/BM-based NGF(-) showed a non-significant shorter median progression free survival than those with QIP-MS(-)/BM-based NGF(-). In summary, we show the first experience to our knowledge demonstrating that QIP-MS could be particularly useful as a non-invasive technique when evaluating response after CAR T-cell treatment in MM.

Keywords: CAR T‐cell therapy; mass spectrometry; multiple myeloma.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Kumar SK, Rajkumar V, Kyle RA, van Duin M, Sonneveld P, Mateos MV, et al. Multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17046.
    1. Tate JR, Graziani MS, Mollee P, Merlini G. Protein electrophoresis and serum free light chains in the diagnosis and monitoring of plasma cell disorders: laboratory testing and current controversies. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54:899–905.
    1. Puig N, Contreras MT, Agulló C, Martínez‐López J, Oriol A, Blanchard MJ, et al. Mass spectrometry vs immunofixation for treatment monitoring in multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2022;6:3234–3239.
    1. van de Donk NWCJ, Usmani SZ, Yong K. CAR T‐cell therapy for multiple myeloma: state of the art and prospects. Lancet Haematol. 2021;8:e446–e461.
    1. Perrot A, Lauwers‐Cances V, Corre J, Robillard N, Hulin C, Chretien ML, et al. Minimal residual disease negativity using deep sequencing is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018;132:2456–2464.

Substances