Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;16(4):e12972.
doi: 10.1111/soc4.12972. Epub 2022 Feb 17.

Unequal effects of disruptive events

Affiliations

Unequal effects of disruptive events

Taylor Aquino et al. Sociol Compass. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Disruptive events have significant consequences for the individuals and families who experience them, but these effects do not occur equally across the population. While some groups are strongly affected, others experience few consequences. We review recent findings on inequality in the effects of disruptive events. We consider heterogeneity based on socioeconomic resources, race/ethnicity, the likelihood of experiencing disruption, and contextual factors such as the normativity of the event in particular social settings. We focus on micro-level events affecting specific individuals and families, including divorce, job loss, home loss and eviction, health shocks and deaths, and violence and incarceration, but also refer to macro-level events such as recession and natural disasters. We describe patterns of variation that suggest a process of resource disparities and cumulative disadvantage versus those that reflect the impact of non-normative and unexpected shocks. Finally, we review methodological considerations when examining variation in the effect of disruptive events.

Keywords: disruptive events; divorce; eviction; health shocks; heterogeneity; incarceration; job loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abadie A, & Imbens GW (2016). Matching on the estimated propensity score. Econometrica, 84(2), 781–807.
    1. Almond D, Edlund L, & Palme R (2009). Chernobyl’s subclinical legacy: Prenatal exposure to readioactive fallout and school outcomes in Sweden. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 1729–1772.
    1. Amato PR (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1269–1287.
    1. Amato PR, & Booth A (1997). A generation at risk: Growing up in an era of family upheaval (Vol. 79). Harvard University Press; (ISBN: 02138–1423).
    1. Aneshensel CS (1992). Social stress: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 15–38.