The impact of Chinese volume-based procurement on pharmaceutical market concentration
- PMID: 38895618
- PMCID: PMC11183305
- DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1386533
The impact of Chinese volume-based procurement on pharmaceutical market concentration
Abstract
Objectives: Optimizing the pharmaceutical industrial structure is the key mission of China's healthcare reform. From the industrial structure perspective, this study empirically evaluated the impact of China's national volume-based procurement (NVBP) policy on market concentration in the hospital-end drug market.
Methods: This study used drug procurement data of China's public medical institutions which obtained from the national database. A quasi-natural experiment was designed involving eleven pairs of matched treatment-control region combinations, with NVBP policy as the intervention measure. The market was defined by drug name (molecular boundary) and city/province (geographical boundary). Market changes were measured from three dimensions: the number of enterprises and products, market share, and Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI). Dual comparison approach and difference-in-difference (DID) method with fixed effect model were applied to quantify policy impacts.
Results: The number of enterprises and products decreased by 18 and 83 in pilot regions after NVBP policy, far more than the decreases in control regions (6 and 21). The accumulative market share of 15 bid-winning enterprises increased by 53.67% in volume and 18.79% in value, among which the increment of enterprises with low baseline market share was more prominent (66.64% and 36.40%). Among three enterprise types, the market share of generic consistency evaluation (GCE) certificated generics significantly increased, GCE uncertificated generics significantly decreased, and originators slightly decreased. DID models indicated significantly positive impact of NVBP policy on market concentration, with HHI-volume and HHI-value increasing by 49.33% (β = 0.401, p < 0.01) and 21.05% (β = 0.191, p < 0.01).
Conclusion: The implementation of NVBP promoted the intensive drug circulation and supply of Chinese public hospitals, intensifying the exit of GCE uncertificated generics from the hospital-end market. NVBP combined with GCE standards significantly improved market concentration, which brought a positive signal of pharmaceutical industrial structure optimization in China. In the future context of normalized and institutionalized NVBP, the balance should be further sought between low drug prices and reliable hospital drug supply, sustainable industry development.
Keywords: drug market; group purchasing; market concentration; pharmaceutical industry; volume-based procurement.
Copyright © 2024 Yang, Liu, Mao, Mao and Jin.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures





Similar articles
-
The change of drug utilization in China's public healthcare institutions under the "4 + 7" centralized drug procurement policy: Evidence from a natural experiment in China.Front Pharmacol. 2022 Aug 23;13:923209. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.923209. eCollection 2022. Front Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 36081942 Free PMC article.
-
Improving access to medicines and beyond: the national volume-based procurement policy in China.BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jul;8(7):e011535. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011535. BMJ Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 37463786 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of China's National Centralized Drug Procurement Policy on pharmaceutical enterprises' financial performance: a quasi-natural experimental study.Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 3;11:1227102. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1227102. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 38026347 Free PMC article.
-
Does China's national volume-based drug procurement policy promote or hinder pharmaceutical innovation?Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jun 27;15:1392239. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1392239. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 38994196 Free PMC article.
-
Lowering drug prices and enhancing pharmaceutical affordability: an analysis of the national volume-based procurement (NVBP) effect in China.BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Sep;6(9):e005519. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005519. BMJ Glob Health. 2021. PMID: 34518200 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0320189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320189. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40131983 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of outpatients regarding National centralized drug procurement policy: a multicenter cross-sectional study in North China.Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22923. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98967-0. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40595440 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmaceutical expenditure changes under the volume-based procurement policy: Effects and influencing factors.PLoS One. 2025 Aug 14;20(8):e0330296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330296. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40811746 Free PMC article.
-
Testing the unintended cost effects of health policies for generic substitutions: the case of China's National Volume-Based Procurement (NVBP) policy.Health Policy Plan. 2025 Feb 6;40(2):194-205. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae101. Health Policy Plan. 2025. PMID: 39512190 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bergman M. A., Granlund D., Rudholm N. (2017). Squeezing the last drop out of your suppliers: an empirical study of market‐based purchasing policies for generic pharmaceuticals. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Statistics 79, 969–996. 10.1111/obes.12180 - DOI
-
- Chang F. (2021). Analysis on the core elements of volume-based drug procurement. Chin. Health Resour. 24, 15–19. 10.13688/j.cnki.chr.2021.200774 - DOI
-
- Chen M., Xu Y., He J., Song J., Jin C. (2022). Analysis and enlightenment of scale structure of national volume-based procurement. Chin. Health Econ. 41, 67–69.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources