Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 3;31(3):550-573.
doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2206879. eCollection 2024.

Towards a context-specific approach to understanding lawyers' well-being: a synthesis review and future research agenda

Affiliations

Towards a context-specific approach to understanding lawyers' well-being: a synthesis review and future research agenda

Lucinda Soon et al. Psychiatr Psychol Law. .

Abstract

Legal sector organisations face mounting pressure to protect and promote lawyers' well-being. However, knowledge is fragmented, hindering research and practice development. Our review investigated current conceptual understanding and empirical evidence of contextual influences. We systematically mapped the global scholarly and grey literature published since 1970, reviewing 145 relevant publications. Lawyers' well-being is conceptualised primarily as ill-being, despite well-being's positive facets. Empirical consideration of work context is mostly absent, though we deduce a focus on large commercial law firm practice and public service/legal aid. Our explanatory synthesis is abductive, coalescing Bourdieu's concepts of field and habitus with Hobfoll's conservation of resources theory to explain how context influences lawyers' well-being via distinct resource losses. We urge theoretical development to elucidate the role of context and theory-driven research on the cumulative effects of resource loss and gain. Recommendations for practice include a renewed focus on job design and line management upskilling.

Keywords: conservation of resources theory; lawyers; legal professionals; systematic review; work-related well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Lucinda Soon has declared no conflicts of interest Almuth McDowall has declared no conflicts of interest Kevin R. H. Teoh has declared no conflicts of interest

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Review search terms.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Literature selection and screening process.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Growth in publications over the past 50 years.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams, R. J., Smart, P., & Huff, A. S. (2017). Shades of grey: Guidelines for working with the grey literature in systematic reviews for management and organizational studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(4), 432–454. 10.1111/ijmr.12102 - DOI
    1. Anker, J., & Krill, P. R. (2021). Stress, drink, leave: An examination of gender-specific risk factors for mental health problems and attrition among licensed attorneys. Plos One, 16(5), e0250563. 10.1371/journal.pone.0250563 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bagust, J. (2014). The culture of bullying in Australian corporate law firms. Legal Ethics, 17(2), 177–201. 10.5235/1460728X.17.2.177 - DOI
    1. Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2010). Positive occupational health psychology. In Leka S. & Houdmont J. (Eds.), Occupational health psychology (pp. 194–224). John Wiley & Sons.
    1. Baron, P. (2015). The elephant in the room? Lawyer wellbeing and the impact of unethical behaviours. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 41(1), 87–119. 10.1080/13200968.2015.1035209 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources