The privilege and the pressure: judges' and magistrates' reflections on the sources and impacts of stress in judicial work
- PMID: 38895730
- PMCID: PMC11182077
- DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2024.2335913
The privilege and the pressure: judges' and magistrates' reflections on the sources and impacts of stress in judicial work
Abstract
There is growing evidence that judges and magistrates experience both high stress and high satisfaction in their work; however, the subjective experience of judicial stress and the cultural and professional factors shaping that experience remain largely unexamined. This qualitative study builds upon earlier quantitative research with the Australian judiciary, by exploring judges' and magistrates' perceptions of the sources and impacts of judicial stress and their ideas for court responses. Thematic analysis of 59 in-depth interviews with judicial officers from five Australian courts revealed eight themes pertaining to the better understanding and management of occupational stress within the judiciary. Implications for courts and individual judicial officers are discussed.
Keywords: judges; judicial job satisfaction; judicial stress; judicial wellbeing; magistrates; qualitative research; systemic intervention; thematic analysis; workload stress.
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Conflict of interest statement
Carly Schrever has declared no conflicts of interest Carol Hulbert has declared no conflicts of interest Tania Sourdin has declared no conflicts of interest
Similar articles
-
Where stress presides: predictors and correlates of stress among Australian judges and magistrates.Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 May 24;29(2):290-322. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1904456. eCollection 2022. Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021. PMID: 35755152 Free PMC article.
-
Vicarious trauma in the judicial workplace: state liability for judicial psychiatric injury in Australia.Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2024 May 7;31(3):466-499. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2024.2340697. eCollection 2024. Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2024. PMID: 38895727 Free PMC article.
-
Judicial Self-Governance Index: Towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary.Regul Gov. 2023 Jan;17(1):22-42. doi: 10.1111/rego.12453. Epub 2022 Jan 4. Regul Gov. 2023. PMID: 37035415 Free PMC article.
-
The case of "Judge Nodd" and other sleeping judges--media, society, and judicial sleepiness.Sleep. 2007 May;30(5):625-32. doi: 10.1093/sleep/30.5.625. Sleep. 2007. PMID: 17552378 Review.
-
Tobacco industry use of judicial seminars to influence rulings in products liability litigation.Tob Control. 2006 Apr;15(2):120-4. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.013128. Tob Control. 2006. PMID: 16565460 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Adam, K. (2007). The price I paid for being a “good judge”. Judicial edge: Reflections from the bench. Retrieved from https://www.judges.org/news-and-info/the-price-i-paid-for-being-a-good-j....
-
- AIJA. (2018). Judicial Gender Statistics. https://aija.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/2022-Judicial-Gender-Stat....
-
- Amazarray, M. R., Oliveira, G. F., & Feijo, F. R. (2019). Occupational context and common mental disorders in workers from the federal judiciary in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Psychology Organisations and Work Journal, 19(3), 687–694.
-
- Appleby, G., Le Mire, S., Lynch, A., & Opeskin, B. (2019). Contemporary challenges facing the Australian judiciary: An empirical interruption. Melbourne University Law Review, 42(2), 299–369.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources