Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Aug 1;47(8):1325-1332.
doi: 10.2337/dc24-0188.

Efficacy and Safety of LX9211 for Relief of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (RELIEF-DPN 1): Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Proof-of-Concept Study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy and Safety of LX9211 for Relief of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (RELIEF-DPN 1): Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Proof-of-Concept Study

Rodica Pop-Busui et al. Diabetes Care. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of LX9211 in reducing pain related to diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Research design and methods: In this double-blind, multicenter, proof-of-concept trial, 319 individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) were randomized (1:1:1) to LX9211 10 mg (n = 106), LX9211 20 mg (n = 106), or matching placebo (n = 107), administered once daily for 6 weeks. DPNP was rated daily with an 11-point numerical rating scale. The primary end point was change from baseline to week 6 in the average daily pain score. The difference between each LX9211 group and placebo was evaluated with mixed-model repeated-measures analysis.

Results: For those on low-dose LX9211 the primary efficacy end point was achieved: -1.39 vs. -0.72 points for placebo, least squares mean (SE) difference -0.67 (0.249), 95% CI -1.16 to -0.18, P = 0.007; results for high-dose LX9211 demonstrated improvement in pain severity versus placebo (-1.27 vs. -0.72 points, respectively), but the between-group LS mean difference did not reach the prespecified statistical significance (-0.55 [0.254], 95% CI -1.06 to -0.05, P = 0.030). Treatment benefit was observed beginning at week 1 and maintained thereafter. Results for LX9211 also demonstrated improvement in several patient-reported secondary outcomes. Most common adverse events (AEs) were dizziness, nausea, and headache. More participants treated with LX9211 (20 mg, n = 28 [26.4%]; 10 mg, 17 [16.0%]) than placebo (3 [2.8%]) discontinued study drug prematurely due to AEs; serious AEs were uncommon (2 [1.9%], 0, and 1 [0.9%], respectively).

Conclusions: These preliminary findings of improvement in DPNP with LX9211 support further investigation in larger trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
LS mean difference in change from baseline in ADPS at week 6. ADPS was derived from participants’ answer to question no. 5 of the BPI-DPN (“Please rate your pain due to your diabetes by indicating the one number that best describes your pain on the average,” using an 11-point numerical rating scale [0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine]). Baseline value was defined as the average of the week 2 run-in period data. A minimum of 4 days (consecutive or nonconsecutive) of daily pain diary data from week 5 to week 6 was required for the calculation of mean weekly ADPS at week 6.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pop-Busui R, Boulton AJ, Feldman EL, et al. . Diabetic neuropathy: a position statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2017;40:136–154 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braffett BH, Gubitosi-Klug RA, Albers JW, et al. .; DCCT/EDIC Research Group . Risk factors for diabetic peripheral neuropathy and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) study. Diabetes 2020;69:1000–1010 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abbott CA, Malik RA, van Ross ER, Kulkarni J, Boulton AJ. Prevalence and characteristics of painful diabetic neuropathy in a large community-based diabetic population in the U.K. Diabetes Care 2011;34:2220–2224 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jensen TS, Karlsson P, Gylfadottir SS, et al. . Painful and non-painful diabetic neuropathy, diagnostic challenges and implications for future management. Brain 2021;144:1632–1645 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ang L, Mizokami-Stout K, Eid SA, et al. . The conundrum of diabetic neuropathies-past, present, and future. J Diabetes Complications 2022;36:108334. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types