Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb;65(1):101-106.
doi: 10.1111/ajo.13851. Epub 2024 Jun 19.

Inter-observer reproducibility of the 2021 AAGL Endometriosis Classification

Jason Nicholas Mak  1 , Cansu Uzuner  1 , Mercedes Espada  2   3 , Allie Eathorn  4 , Shannon Reid  5   6 , Mathew Leonardi  7 , Mike Armour  8 , George Stanley Condous  1   3   9
Affiliations

Inter-observer reproducibility of the 2021 AAGL Endometriosis Classification

Jason Nicholas Mak et al. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Inter-observer agreement for the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) 2021 Endometriosis Classification staging system has not been described. Its predecessor staging system, the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine (rASRM), has historically demonstrated poor inter-observer agreement.

Aims: We aimed to determine the inter-observer agreement performance of the AAGL 2021 Endometriosis Classification staging system, and compare this with the rASRM staging system.

Materials and methods: A database of 317 patients with coded surgical data was retrospectively analysed. Three independent observers allocated AAGL surgical stages (1-4), twice. Observers made their own interpretation of how to apply the tool in the first staging allocation. Consensus rules were then developed for a second staging allocation.

Results: First staging allocation: odds ratio (OR) (and 95% CI) for observer 1 to score higher than observer 2 was 8.08 (5.12-12.76). Observer 1 to score higher than observer 3 was 12.98 (7.99-21.11) and observer 2 to score higher than observer 3 was 1.61 (1.03-2.51). This represents poor agreement. Second staging allocation (after consensus): OR for observer 1 to score higher than observer 2 was 1.14 (0.64-2.03), observer 1 to score higher than observer 3 was 1.81 (0.99-3.28) and observer 2 to score higher than observer 3 was 1.59 (0.87-2.89). This represents good agreement.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that in its current format the AAGL 2021 Endometriosis Classification staging system has poor inter-observer agreement, not superior to the rASRM staging system. However, performance improved when additional measures were taken to simplify and clarify areas of ambiguity in interpreting the staging system.

Keywords: endometriosis; laparoscopic surgery; observer variation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consensus rules for interpreting the 2021 American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) 2021 Endometriosis Classification.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Andres MP, Borrelli GM, Abrão MS. Endometriosis classification according to pain symptoms: can the ASRM classification be improved? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 51: 111–118. - PubMed
    1. Haas D, Shebl O, Shamiyeh A, Oppelt P. The rASRM score and the Enzian classification for endometriosis: their strengths and weaknesses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92(1): 3–7. - PubMed
    1. Buchweitz O, Wülfing P, Malik E. Interobserver variability in the diagnosis of minimal and mild endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005; 122(2): 213–217. - PubMed
    1. Abrao MS, Andres MP, Miller CE et al. AAGL 2021 endometriosis classification: an anatomy‐based surgical complexity score. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021; 28(11): 1941–1950.e1. - PubMed
    1. Mak J, Eathorne A, Leonardi M et al. External validation of the “2021 AAGL Endometriosis Classification”: a retrospective cohort study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2023; 30: 374–381. - PubMed