GAPS phase II: development and pilot results of the global assessment in pediatric surgery, an evidence-based pediatric surgical capacity assessment tool for low-resource settings
- PMID: 38896255
- DOI: 10.1007/s00383-024-05741-w
GAPS phase II: development and pilot results of the global assessment in pediatric surgery, an evidence-based pediatric surgical capacity assessment tool for low-resource settings
Abstract
Purpose: Pediatric surgical care in low- and middle-income countries is often hindered by systemic gaps in healthcare resources, infrastructure, training, and organization. This study aims to develop and validate the Global Assessment of Pediatric Surgery (GAPS) to appraise pediatric surgical capacity and discriminate between levels of care across diverse healthcare settings.
Methods: The GAPS Version 1 was constructed through a synthesis of existing assessment tools and expert panel consultation. The resultant GAPS Version 2 underwent international pilot testing. Construct validation categorized institutions into providing basic or advanced surgical care. GAPS was further refined to Version 3 to include only questions with a > 75% response rate and those that significantly discriminated between basic or advanced surgical settings.
Results: GAPS Version 1 included 139 items, which, after expert panel feedback, was expanded to 168 items in Version 2. Pilot testing, in 65 institutions, yielded a high response rate. Of the 168 questions in GAPS Version 2, 64 significantly discriminated between basic and advanced surgical care. The refined GAPS Version 3 tool comprises 64 questions on: human resources (9), material resources (39), outcomes (3), accessibility (3), and education (10).
Conclusion: The GAPS Version 3 tool presents a validated instrument for evaluating pediatric surgical capabilities in low-resource settings.
Keywords: Children’s surgery; Global health; Global surgery; Low-income country; Middle-income country; Pediatric surgery.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L, Alkire BC, Alonso N, Ameh EA, Bickler SW, Conteh L, Dare AJ, Davies J, Merisier ED, El-Halabi S, Farmer PE, Gawande A, Gillies R, Greenberg SL, Grimes CE, Gruen RL, Ismail EA, Kamara TB, Lavy C, Lundeg G, Mkandawire NC, Raykar NP, Riesel JN, Rodas E, Rose J, Roy N, Shrime MG, Sullivan R, Verguet S, Watters D, Weiser TG, Wilson IH, Yamey G, Yip W (2016) Global surgery 2030: Evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Int J Obstet Anesth 25:75–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.09.006.ORG/ - DOI - PubMed
-
- Meara JG, Hagander L, Leather AJM (2014) Surgery and global health: A lancet commission. Lancet 383:12–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62345-4.ORG/ - DOI - PubMed
-
- Makasa EM (2014) Letter to global health agency leaders on the importance of surgical indicators. Lancet 384:1748. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62012-2.ORG/ - DOI - PubMed
-
- Huber B (2015) Finding surgery’s place on the global health agenda. Lancet 385:1821–1822. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60761-9.ORG/ - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dare AJ, Grimes CE, Gillies R, Greenberg SL, Hagander L, Meara JG, Leather AJ (2014) Global surgery: Defining an emerging global health field. Lancet 384:2245–2247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60237-3.ORG/ - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
