Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Aug;40(8):1725-1734.
doi: 10.1007/s10554-024-03162-3. Epub 2024 Jun 19.

Feasibility of left atrial strain assessment using cardiac computed tomography in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Feasibility of left atrial strain assessment using cardiac computed tomography in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Takaaki Hosokawa et al. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of left atrial strain (LAS) assessment using cardiac computed tomography (CT) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).

Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 98 patients with PAF who underwent cardiac CT and echocardiography before the first catheter ablation. LAS was analyzed using cardiac CT (CT-LAS) and speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE; STE-LAS). LA reservoir (LASr), conduit (LASc), and pump strain (LASp) were calculated by averaging LAS measured in 4- and 2-chamber views. The results were compared using Pearson's correlation coefficients, paired t-tests, and Bland-Altman analysis. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate reproducibility.

Results: CT-LAS could be analyzed in all patients, while STE-LAS could be analyzed in 53 (54%) patients. LASr, LASc, and LASp showed significant correlations between CT- and STE-LAS: LASr, r = 0.68, p < 0.001; LASc, r = 0.47, p < 0.001; LASp, r = 0.67, p < 0.001. LASr, LASc, and LASp of CT- and STE-LAS were 23.7 ± 6.0% and 22.1 ± 6.7%, 11.1 ± 3.6% and 11.1 ± 4.1%, and 12.6 ± 4.6% and 11.0 ± 4.1%, respectively. LASr and LASp were significantly higher in CT-LAS than that in STE-LAS (p = 0.023 for LASr and p = 0.001 for LASp). CT-LAS showed excellent reproducibility. The intra- and interobserver ICCs were 0.96 to 0.99 and 0.89 to 0.90, respectively.

Conclusion: CT-LAS was successfully analyzed in more patients than STE-LAS and was highly reproducible. The findings suggest that CT-LAS is feasible for patients with PAF.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Computed tomography; Left atrial function; Left atrial strain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A et al (2019) Heart disease and stroke statistics-2019 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 139:e56–e528. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N et al (2021) 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): the Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 42:373–498. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoit BD (2014) Left atrial size and function: role in prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:493–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.055 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abhayaratna WP, Seward JB, Appleton CP et al (2006) Left atrial size: physiologic determinants and clinical applications. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:2357–2363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.048 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brecht A, Oertelt-Prigione S, Seeland U et al (2016) Left atrial function in preclinical diastolic dysfunction: two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography-derived results from the BEFRI trial. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 29:750–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2016.03.013 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources