Long-Term Outcomes of Tricuspid Valve Replacement With Mechanical Versus Tissue Valves: Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data
- PMID: 38897268
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.06.010
Long-Term Outcomes of Tricuspid Valve Replacement With Mechanical Versus Tissue Valves: Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data
Abstract
Tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) with mechanical versus tissue valves remains a controversial subject. To evaluate the long-term effects of types of valves on patient-relevant outcomes, we performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data of studies published by March 15, 2024 (according to referred the Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines). A total of 21 studies met our eligibility criteria and included 7,166 patients (mechanical: 2,495 patients, 34.8%). Patients who underwent mechanical TVR had a lower risk of death than those who received a tissue valve (hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.84, p <0.001). Mechanical TVR was associated with lifetime gain, as evidenced by the restricted mean survival time, which was 2.2 years longer in patients who underwent TVR with mechanical valves (12.4 vs 10.2 years, p <0.001). Our landmark analysis for reoperations revealed the following: from the time point 0 to 7 years, we found no difference in the risk of reoperation between mechanical and tissues valves (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.61, p = 0.946); however, from the time point 7 years onward, we found that mechanical TVR had a lower risk of reoperation in the follow-up (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.72, p = 0.001). The meta-regression analysis demonstrated a modulating effect of atrial fibrillation on the association between mechanical valves and mortality; the HRs for all-cause death tended to decrease in the presence of populations with a larger proportion of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.018). In conclusion, our results suggest that TVR with mechanical valves, whenever considered clinically reasonable and accepted by patients as an option, can offer a better long-term survival and lower risk of reoperation in the long run.
Keywords: cardiac surgical procedures; cardiovascular surgical procedures; heart valve diseases; heart valve prosthesis implantation; meta-analysis; tricuspid valve replacement.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest Dr. Sultan receives institutional research support from Abbott, Artivion, Boston Scientific, Edwards, Medtronic, and Terumo Aortic. The remaining authors have no competing interest to declare.
Similar articles
-
Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement in the Tricuspid Valve Position: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Mar;30(3):362-371. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Apr 1. Heart Lung Circ. 2021. PMID: 33229238
-
Which type of valve should we use in tricuspid position? Long-term comparison between mechanical and biological valves.J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017 Oct;58(5):739-746. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.16.09553-7. Epub 2016 Sep 16. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017. PMID: 27636399
-
Tricuspid valve replacement: bioprostheses are preferable.J Heart Valve Dis. 1999 Nov;8(6):644-8. J Heart Valve Dis. 1999. PMID: 10616242
-
Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data of 122 989 Patients With 592 952 Patient-Years.J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Apr 2;13(7):e033176. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033176. Epub 2024 Mar 27. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024. PMID: 38533939 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanical tricuspid valve replacement is not superior in patients younger than 65 years who need long-term anticoagulation.Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Apr;93(4):1154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.11.075. Epub 2012 Feb 25. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22365259
Cited by
-
Outcomes of isolated tricuspid replacement versus repair among older patients with tricuspid regurgitation in the United States.JTCVS Open. 2024 Oct 28;24:127-146. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.10.018. eCollection 2025 Apr. JTCVS Open. 2024. PMID: 40309683 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term prognosis and risk factors in tricuspid valve replacement surgery: a single-center study.Front Surg. 2025 Apr 8;12:1532945. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1532945. eCollection 2025. Front Surg. 2025. PMID: 40264744 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous