Ultrasonic fetal weight prediction: role of head circumference and femur length
- PMID: 3889747
Ultrasonic fetal weight prediction: role of head circumference and femur length
Abstract
The accurate sonographic estimate of fetal weight is helpful in those instances when the fetal weight estimate might alter clinical management. Most sonographic weight predicting formulas have been based predominantly on measurements from the term fetus and then applied to the preterm fetus. Yet, the morphology of the preterm and term fetus differs considerably. The authors have examined the predictive accuracy of three published sonographic formulas in 69 preterm fetuses scanned within 48 hours of delivery. The mean birth weight was 1396 g. Thirty-nine of the infants were less than 1500 g. Sixty-two percent were products of pregnancies complicated by premature rupture of membranes. The results were compared with new equations derived from combinations of head and abdominal circumferences, biparietal diameter, and femur length obtained from the first 33 fetuses and then tested on the remaining 36. Whereas each formula correlated highly with birth weight, the selected new formula was more accurate than the published formulas by each criteria examined. In contrast to the latter, the mean error (actual minus predicted weight) of most new equations did not significantly differ from zero when tested prospectively. In addition, it appeared that the accuracy of two new formulas not incorporating femur length could be further enhanced in the group of fetuses whose femur length differed from the mean by at least 2 standard deviations by multiplying the predicted weight by the ratio of actual to mean femur length. The authors conclude that the use of head circumference and femur length coupled with a population restricted to the preterm fetus enhances the accuracy of sonographic weight predictions.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of fetal weight estimation formulas with and without head measurements.Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Apr;67(4):569-73. Obstet Gynecol. 1986. PMID: 3515257
-
Ultrasonic prediction of term birth weight in Hispanic women. Accuracy in an outpatient clinic.J Reprod Med. 2003 Jan;48(1):13-22. J Reprod Med. 2003. PMID: 12611089
-
A new formula for calculating weight in the fetus of < or = 1600 g.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Dec;24(7):775-80. doi: 10.1002/uog.1741. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15476297
-
Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume.Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Sep;82(3):365-70. Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8355935 Review.
-
Birth weight prediction from remote ultrasound examination.Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jun;71(6 Pt 1):893-8. Obstet Gynecol. 1988. PMID: 3285269 Review.
Cited by
-
The accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in comparison to birth weight: A systematic review.Ultrasound. 2018 Feb;26(1):32-41. doi: 10.1177/1742271X17732807. Epub 2018 Feb 7. Ultrasound. 2018. PMID: 29456580 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior Superior Iliac Spine to the Tibial Tuberosity Length: An Easier, Accurate, and Faster Method for Predicting Orogastric Tube Length in Neonates-An Observational Study.Glob Pediatr Health. 2017 Mar 30;4:2333794X16687190. doi: 10.1177/2333794X16687190. eCollection 2017. Glob Pediatr Health. 2017. PMID: 28491919 Free PMC article.
-
Reference values of fetal ultrasound biometry: results of a prospective cohort study in Lithuania.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Nov;306(5):1503-1517. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06437-z. Epub 2022 Feb 27. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022. PMID: 35220480
-
Fetal Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Models: Systems Information on Fetal Biometry and Gross Composition.Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 Sep;57(9):1149-1171. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0618-1. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018. PMID: 29264787
-
Partial dependence of ultrasonically estimated fetal weight on biometric parameters.R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jun 18;12(6):250172. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250172. eCollection 2025 Jun. R Soc Open Sci. 2025. PMID: 40535947 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources