Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Jun 19:385:e077890.
doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077890.

Nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine versus cisplatin and gemcitabine as first line chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: randomised phase 3 clinical trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine versus cisplatin and gemcitabine as first line chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: randomised phase 3 clinical trial

Guo-Ying Liu et al. BMJ. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine (nab-TPC) with gemcitabine and cisplatin as an alternative first line treatment option for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Design: Phase 3, open label, multicentre, randomised trial.

Setting: Four hospitals located in China between September 2019 and August 2022.

Participants: Adults (≥18 years) with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Interventions: Patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with either nab-paclitaxel (200 g/m2 on day 1), cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 1), and capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice on days 1-14) or gemcitabine (1 g/m2 on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1).

Main outcome measures: Progression-free survival was evaluated by the independent review committee as the primary endpoint in the intention-to-treat population.

Results: The median follow-up was 15.8 months in the prespecified interim analysis (31 October 2022). As assessed by the independent review committee, the median progression-free survival was 11.3 (95% confidence interval 9.7 to 12.9) months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 7.7 (6.5 to 9.0) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort. The hazard ratio was 0.43 (95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.73; P=0.002). The objective response rate in the nab-TPC cohort was 83% (34/41) versus 63% (25/40) in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.05), and the duration of response was 10.8 months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 6.9 months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.009). Treatment related grade 3 or 4 adverse events, including leukopenia (4/41 (10%) v 13/40 (33%); P=0.02), neutropenia (6/41 (15%) v 16/40 (40%); P=0.01), and anaemia (1/41 (2%) v 8/40 (20%); P=0.01), were higher in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort than in the nab-TPC cohort. No deaths related to treatment occurred in either treatment group. Survival and long term toxicity are still being evaluated with longer follow-up.

Conclusion: The nab-TPC regimen showed a superior antitumoural efficacy and favourable safety profile compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Nab-TPC should be considered the standard first line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the benefits for overall survival.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900027112.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: support from the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China, CPSF, and Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Consort diagram of study
Fig 2
Fig 2
Kaplan-Meier plots of progression-free survival (top) and duration of response (bottom) assessed by independent review of images from randomly assigned patients. CI=confidence interval; GP=gemcitabine and cisplatin; Nab-TPC=nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine
Fig 3
Fig 3
Hazard ratio of progression-free survival (nab-TPC over GP) in subgroups according to baseline characteristics. CI=confidence interval; EBV-Epstein-Barr virus; GP=gemcitabine and cisplatin; nab-TPC=paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine
None

References

    1. Chen YP, Chan ATC, Le QT, Blanchard P, Sun Y, Ma J. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet 2019;394:64-80. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30956-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209-49. 10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang Y, Chen L, Hu GQ, et al. . Final Overall Survival Analysis of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Induction Chemotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol 2022;40:2420-5. 10.1200/JCO.22.00327 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen YP, Liu X, Zhou Q, et al. . Metronomic capecitabine as adjuvant therapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2021;398:303-13. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01123-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sun Y, Li WF, Chen NY, et al. . Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:1509-20. 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30410-7 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms