Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 19;14(1):14179.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64847-2.

Social and environmental stressors of cardiometabolic health

Affiliations

Social and environmental stressors of cardiometabolic health

Anna Bartoskova Polcrova et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Exposures to social and environmental stressors arise individual behavioural response and thus indirectly affect cardiometabolic health. The aim of this study was to investigate several social and environmental stressors and the paths of their influence on cardiometabolic health. The data of 2154 participants (aged 25-64 years) from the cross-sectional population-based study were analysed. The composite score of metabolic disorders (MS score) was calculated based on 5 biomarkers: waist circumference, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides. The effects of social stressors (education level, income), environmental stressors (NO2, noise) and behavioural factors (unhealthy diet, smoking, alcohol consumption, sedentary behaviours) on MS score were assessed using a structural model. We observed a direct effect of education on MS score, as well as an indirect effect mediated via an unhealthy diet, smoking, and sedentary behaviours. We also observed a significant indirect effect of income via sedentary behaviours. The only environmental stressor predicting MS was noise, which also mediated the effect of education. In summary, the effect of social stressors on the development of cardiometabolic risk had a higher magnitude than the effect of the assessed environmental factors. Social stressors lead to an individual's unhealthy behaviour and might predispose individuals to higher levels of environmental stressors exposures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Observed statistically significant relationships in complex structural model. Bold values represent direct and the indirect effect through specific mediator. Reported results significant at p < 0.05. Dotted lines represent tested but statistically non-significant relationships (at 5% level of significance).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roth GA, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019: Update from the GBD 2019 study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020;76:2982–3021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). GBD Compare. University of Washington. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/ (2015).
    1. Dzúrová D. Mortality differentials in the Czech Republic during the post-1989 socio–political transformation. Health Place. 2000;6:351–362. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8292(00)00016-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Žejglicová K, Kratěnová J, Lustigová M, Malý M. Trends in health indicators in the urban middle-aged population in the Czech Republic in 1998–2010. Public Health. 2016;137:81–87. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.11.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cífková R, et al. 30-year trends in major cardiovascular risk factors in the Czech population, Czech MONICA and Czech post-MONICA, 1985–2016/17. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0232845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232845. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms