Nurses' perceptions of the design, implementation, and adoption of machine learning clinical decision support: A descriptive qualitative study
- PMID: 38898636
- PMCID: PMC11771625
- DOI: 10.1111/jnu.13001
Nurses' perceptions of the design, implementation, and adoption of machine learning clinical decision support: A descriptive qualitative study
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to explore nurses' perspectives on Machine Learning Clinical Decision Support (ML CDS) design, development, implementation, and adoption.
Design: Qualitative descriptive study.
Methods: Nurses (n = 17) participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using Thematic analysis methods as described by Braun and Clarke.
Results: Four major themes and 14 sub-themes highlight nurses' perspectives on autonomy in decision-making, the influence of prior experience in shaping their preferences for use of novel CDS tools, the need for clarity in why ML CDS is useful in improving practice/outcomes, and their desire to have nursing integrated in design and implementation of these tools.
Conclusion: This study provided insights into nurse perceptions regarding the utility and usability of ML CDS as well as the influence of previous experiences with technology and CDS, change management strategies needed at the time of implementation of ML CDS, the importance of nurse-perceived engagement in the development process, nurse information needs at the time of ML CDS deployment, and the perceived impact of ML CDS on nurse decision making autonomy.
Clinical relevance: This study contributes to the body of knowledge about the use of AI and machine learning (ML) in nursing practice. Through generation of insights drawn from nurses' perspectives, these findings can inform successful design and adoption of ML Clinical Decision Support.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; clinical decision support; machine learning; nurses.
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Nursing Scholarship published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Sigma Theta Tau International.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
An exploratory study on baccalaureate-prepared nurses' perceptions regarding clinical decision-making in mainland China.J Clin Nurs. 2012 Jun;21(11-12):1706-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03925.x. Epub 2011 Dec 17. J Clin Nurs. 2012. PMID: 22176707
-
Clinician Perspectives on Decision Support and AI-based Decision Support in a Pediatric ED.Hosp Pediatr. 2024 Oct 1;14(10):828-835. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2023-007653. Hosp Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 39318354
-
Nurses' experiences of using a computer-based triage decision support system in the emergency department.Nurs Crit Care. 2024 Sep;29(5):1078-1085. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13039. Epub 2024 Feb 5. Nurs Crit Care. 2024. PMID: 38314635
-
Nurses' autonomy: influence of nurse managers' actions.J Adv Nurs. 2004 Feb;45(3):326-36. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02893.x. J Adv Nurs. 2004. PMID: 14720250 Review.
-
Integrative review of clinical decision support for registered nurses in acute care settings.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):441-450. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw084. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017. PMID: 27330074 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Navigating artificial intelligence in home healthcare: challenges and opportunities in nursing wound care.BMC Nurs. 2025 Jun 19;24(1):660. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03348-7. BMC Nurs. 2025. PMID: 40537760 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Benda, N. C. , Das, L. T. , Abramson, E. L. , Blackburn, K. , Thoman, A. , Kaushal, R. , Zhang, Y. , & Ancker, J. S. (2020). “How did you get to this number?” Stakeholder needs for implementing predictive analytics: A pre‐implementation qualitative study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(5), 709–716. 10.1093/jamia/ocaa021 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Berner, E. S. , Webster, G. D. , Shugerman, A. A. , Jackson, J. R. , Algina, J. , Baker, A. L. , Ball, E. V. , Cobbs, C. G. , Dennis, V. W. , Frenkel, E. P. , Hudson, L. D. , Mancall, E. L. , Rackley, C. E. , & Taunton, O. D. (1994). Performance of four computer‐based diagnostic systems. New England Journal of Medicine, 330(25), 1792–1796. - PubMed
-
- Braun, V. , & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
-
- Braun, V. , & Clarke, V. (2022). In Maher A. (Ed.), Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources