Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 14:25:43-47.
doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.03.004. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Biomechanics of aortic valve annuloplasty: Same goal, different techniques

Affiliations

Biomechanics of aortic valve annuloplasty: Same goal, different techniques

Evaldas Girdauskas et al. JTCVS Tech. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

None
Biomechanical effects of 3 different aortic valve annuloplasty approaches.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Biomechanical effects of 3 different aortic valve annuloplasty approaches. A, Asymmetrical bicuspid aortic valve (type C, right-left fusion). B, Polytetrafluoroethylene suture annuloplasty. C, External Dacron/Teflon annuloplasty. D, Internal device annuloplasty.

References

    1. Girdauskas E., Petersen J., Balaban Ü., et al. Outcomes of aortic valve repair: early results from the German Aortic Valve Registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;62(4) - PubMed
    1. Girdauskas E., Balaban Ü., Herrmann E., et al. Aortic valve repair results in better 1-year survival than replacement: results from German Aortic Valve Registry. Ann Thorac Surg. 2024;117(3):517–525. - PubMed
    1. Federspiel J.M., Ehrlich T., Abeln K., Schäfers H.J. Aortic annuloplasty: subcommissural, intra-annular suture techniques, external and internal rings. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2021;7:98–102. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Acharya M., Sherzad H., Tan S., et al. External or subcomissural annuloplasty in bicuspid aortic valve repair: which is better? J Card Surg. 2022;37(3):532–534. - PubMed
    1. Ko H., Bavaria J.E., Habertheuer A., et al. Functional outcomes of type I bicuspid aortic valve repair with annular stabilization:subcommisural annuloplasty versus external subannular aortic ring. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107(1):68–75. - PubMed

E-References

    1. Holst T., Petersen J., Adam G., Reichenspurner H., Girdauskas E., Tahir E. A novel technique to quantify aortic valve annulus deformation: a pilot study. J Card Surg. 2022;37(9):2734–2737. - PubMed
    1. Petersen J., Lenz A., Adam G., Reichenspurner H., Bannas P., Girdauskas E. Changes in transvalvular flow patterns after aortic valve repair: comparison of symmetric versus asymmetric aortic valve geometry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;59(5):1087–1094. - PubMed
    1. Benhassen L.L., Ropcke D.M., Sharghbin M., et al. Comparison of Dacron ring and suture annuloplasty for aortic valve repair-a porcine study. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;8:342–350. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holst T., Petersen J., Sinning C., Reichenspurner H., Girdauskas E. Aortic valve repair in annular dilatation: external vs internal suture annuloplasty. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022;113(6):2036–2044. - PubMed
    1. Michelena H.I., Della Corte A., Evangelista A., et al. International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;162(3):e383–e414. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources