Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 9:12:468-479.
doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2024.3399232. eCollection 2024.

Multispectral Imaging-Based System for Detecting Tissue Oxygen Saturation With Wound Segmentation for Monitoring Wound Healing

Affiliations

Multispectral Imaging-Based System for Detecting Tissue Oxygen Saturation With Wound Segmentation for Monitoring Wound Healing

Chih-Lung Lin et al. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. .

Abstract

Objective: Blood circulation is an important indicator of wound healing. In this study, a tissue oxygen saturation detecting (TOSD) system that is based on multispectral imaging (MSI) is proposed to quantify the degree of tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) in cutaneous tissues.

Methods: A wound segmentation algorithm is used to segment automatically wound and skin areas, eliminating the need for manual labeling and applying adaptive tissue optics. Animal experiments were conducted on six mice in which they were observed seven times, once every two days. The TOSD system illuminated cutaneous tissues with two wavelengths of light - red ([Formula: see text] nm) and near-infrared ([Formula: see text] nm), and StO2 levels were calculated using images that were captured using a monochrome camera. The wound segmentation algorithm using ResNet34-based U-Net was integrated with computer vision techniques to improve its performance.

Results: Animal experiments revealed that the wound segmentation algorithm achieved a Dice score of 93.49%. The StO2 levels that were determined using the TOSD system varied significantly among the phases of wound healing. Changes in StO2 levels were detected before laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) detected changes in blood flux. Moreover, statistical features that were extracted from the TOSD system and LSCI were utilized in principal component analysis (PCA) to visualize different wound healing phases. The average silhouette coefficients of the TOSD system with segmentation (ResNet34-based U-Net) and LSCI were 0.2890 and 0.0194, respectively.

Conclusion: By detecting the StO2 levels of cutaneous tissues using the TOSD system with segmentation, the phases of wound healing were accurately distinguished. This method can support medical personnel in conducting precise wound assessments. Clinical and Translational Impact Statement-This study supports efforts in monitoring StO2 levels, wound segmentation, and wound healing phase classification to improve the efficiency and accuracy of preclinical research in the field.

Keywords: Multispectral imaging; principal component analysis; tissue oxygen saturation; wound healing; wound segmentation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Hardware architecture of proposed TOSD system. USB: universal serial bus; GUI: graphical user interface.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
System setup of the animal experiments.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Block diagram of image data processing.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Wound segmentation results obtained using different methods. Wound, skin, and background labels are shown in red, yellow, and green, respectively. All scale bars represent 2 mm.
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.
Imaging results of animal experiments (a) monochrome images, (b) blood flux heatmaps, and (c) StO2 heatmaps.
FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6.
Analyzed results of ELISA kit (a) GCSF (b) GM-CSF. n.s. means no significant differences.
FIGURE 7.
FIGURE 7.
PCA scatter plots of all observations of animal experiments in different wound healing phases (a) LSCI, (b) proposed TOSD system without segmentation, (c) proposed TOSD system with ResNet34 (proposed U-Net model).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lucas Y., Niri R., Treuillet S., Douzi H., and Castaneda B., “Wound size imaging: Ready for smart assessment and monitoring,” Adv. Wound Care, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 641–661, Nov. 2021. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sen C. K., “Human wound and its burden: Updated 2020 compendium of estimates,” Adv. Wound Care, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 281–292, May 2021. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greatrex-White S. and Moxey H., “Wound assessment tools and nurses' needs: An evaluation study,” Int. Wound J., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 293–301, Jun. 2015. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomas Hess C., “Checklist for factors affecting wound healing,” Adv. Skin Wound Care, vol. 24, no. 4, p. 192, Apr. 2011. - PubMed
    1. Strauss M. B., Bryant B. J., and Hart G. B., “Transcutaneous oxygen measurements under hyperbaric oxygen conditions as a predictor for healing of problem wounds,” Foot Ankle Int., vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 933–937, Oct. 2002. - PubMed