Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 25;9(6):1765-1773.
doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.03.023. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Citrate-Buffered, Magnesium-Enriched Dialysate on Calcification Propensity in Hemodialysis Patients - The CitMag Study

Affiliations

Citrate-Buffered, Magnesium-Enriched Dialysate on Calcification Propensity in Hemodialysis Patients - The CitMag Study

Daniel Cejka et al. Kidney Int Rep. .

Abstract

Introduction: Serum calcification propensity (T50 time) is associated with mortality in patients on dialysis. Several solitary interventions improve T50. However, whether a combination of interventions yields further increases in T50 is unknown. We hypothesized that a combination of 2 interventions, namely increasing magnesium concentration while simultaneously substituting acetate for citrate in the dialysis fluid, leads to increases in T50 values.

Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, 60 patients on chronic hemodialysis were allocated to either continue on standard (S) dialysate (3 mmol/l acetate, 0.5 mmol/l magnesium) or a sequence of magnesium-enriched (Mg0.75) dialysate (3 mmol/l acetate, 0.75 mmol/l magnesium) for 2 weeks followed by combination treatment using citrate-buffered, magnesium-enriched (Cit+Mg0.75) dialysate (1 mmol/l citrate, 0.75 mmol/l magnesium) for 3 weeks. The primary end point was the difference in T50 times between the S group and the Cit+Mg0.75 group.

Results: There was no significant difference in T50 time between the S group and the Cit+Mg0.75 group (236 ± 77 vs. 265 ± 97 min, P = 0.23). The size (hydrodynamic radius) of secondary calciprotein particles did not differ between the S group and the Cit+Mg0.75 group (294 ± 95 vs. 309 ± 91 nm, P = 0.56). In longitudinal analyses, serum magnesium concentrations increased from 1.07 ± 0.17 to 1.24 ± 0.17 mmol/l with the Mg0.75 dialysate (P < 0.0001) but decreased again to 1.19 ± 0.16 mmol/l with the Cit+Mg0.75 dialysate (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: The combination of citrate buffer with increased magnesium concentration in dialysate does not improve T50.

Keywords: calcification propensity; citrate; dialysis; magnesiumT50.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Serum calcification propensity (T50 time), (b) secondary calciprotein size (hydrodynamic radius [Rh]) of secondary calciprotein particles (CPP-2Rh), (c) serum magnesium, and (d) serum bicarbonate, in patients treated with standard dialysate (3 mmol/l acetate, 0.5 mmol/l magnesium) compared to citrate-buffered, magnesium-enriched (Cit+Mg0.75) dialysate (1 mmol/l citrate, 0.75 mmol/l magnesium).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Longitudinal changes (mean, 95% confidence interval) in serum calcification propensity (T50 time, (b) secondary calciprotein size (CPP-2Rh), (c) serum magnesium, and (d) serum bicarbonate, in patients treated with standard dialysate (3 mmol/l acetate, 0.5 mmol/l magnesium), magnesium-enriched, acetate-buffered (Mg0.75) dialysate (3 mmol/l acetate, 0.75 mmol/l magnesium) and citrate-buffered, magnesium-enriched (Cit+Mg0.75) dialysate (1 mmol/l citrate, 0.75 mmol/l magnesium).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Longitudinal changes (mean, 95% confidence interval) in serum total calcium, (b) serum ionized calcium. (c) serum phosphate, and (d) parathyroid hormone (median and interquartile range), in patients treated with standard dialysate (3 mmol/l acetate, 0.5 mmol/l magnesium), magnesium-enriched, acetate-buffered (Mg0.75) dialysate (3 mmol/l acetate, 0.75 mmol/l magnesium) and citrate-buffered, magnesium-enriched (Cit+Mg0.75) dialysate (1 mmol/l citrate, 0.75 mmol/l magnesium.

References

    1. Roberts M.A., Polkinghorne K.R., McDonald S.P., Ierino F.L. Secular trends in cardiovascular mortality rates of patients receiving dialysis compared with the general population. Am J Kidney Dis Off J Natl Kidney Found. 2011;58:64–72. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.01.024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johansen K.L., Chertow G.M., Gilbertson D.T., et al. US renal data system 2022 annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2023;81(suppl 1):A8–A11. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.12.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD-MBD Update Work Group KDIGO 2017 clinical practice guideline update for the diagnosis, evaluation, prevention, and treatment of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) Kidney Int Suppl. 2017;7:1–59. doi: 10.1016/j.kisu.2017.04.001. Kidney Int Suppl. 2017;7:e1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pasch A., Farese S., Graber S., et al. Nanoparticle-based test measures overall propensity for calcification in serum. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:1744–1752. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012030240. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eelderink C., Te Velde-Keyzer C.A., Frenay A.S., et al. Serum calcification propensity and the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in the general population: the PREVEND study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40:1942–1951. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.314187. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources