Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 20;16(5):e60643.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.60643. eCollection 2024 May.

Advancing Robotic Single-Site Cholecystectomy: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions

Affiliations
Review

Advancing Robotic Single-Site Cholecystectomy: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions

Ubaid Ansari et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

The crystalization of the components of bile within the gallbladder can lead to the formation of gallstones (cholelithiasis), which may often require surgical removal of the gallbladder, a procedure known as cholecystectomy, in symptomatic cases. Robotic single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC) is a recently introduced groundbreaking minimally invasive procedure for gallbladder removal. RSSC utilizes robotic technology, offering enhanced dexterity through a single-incision approach, promising improved outcomes such as reduced postoperative pain and superior cosmesis. However, certain limitations, such as restricted instrument movement and heightened hernia risk, necessitate a critical evaluation of this modality. Furthermore, as the widespread adoption of RSSC remains undecided due to concerns over its costs, efficiency, and overall superiority over prior models, this paper assesses future possibilities for RSSC's evolution. In vivo robotics, improved digital imaging, and re-engineering of the surgical instruments themselves are all potential avenues to augment the current RSSC design, although it is currently unclear as to what extent they could impact the procedure's viability. This review critically examines the available literature on the effectiveness and potency of RSSC compared to its predecessors in the modern healthcare setting and proposes future directions through which innovation could more firmly establish the procedure as the standard of care for cholecystectomy.

Keywords: cholecystectomy; cholelithiasis; future direction; implications; laparoscopic surgery; limitations; robotic single-site cholecystectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Factors influencing gallstone formation: a review of the literature. Sun H, Warren J, Yip J, Ji Y, Hao S, Han W, Ding Y. Biomolecules. 2022;12:24–26. - PMC - PubMed
    1. History of surgery for cholelithiasis: from the era of cholecystostomy to laparoscopic surgery (Article in Japanese) Yamakawa T, Fukuda N. http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11201117/ Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2000;101:877–881. - PubMed
    1. Robotically assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study. Lomanto D, Cheah WK, So JB, Goh PM. Arch Surg. 2001;136:1106–1108. - PubMed
    1. First human surgery with a novel single-port robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single-Site platform. Kroh M, El-Hayek K, Rosenblatt S, Chand B, Escobar P, Kaouk J, Chalikonda S. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:3566–3573. - PubMed
    1. Description of robotic single site cholecystectomy and a review of outcomes. Escobar-Dominguez JE, Hernandez-Murcia C, Gonzalez AM. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:284–288. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources