Economic analysis of foregoing Rh immunoglobulin for bleeding in pregnancy <12 weeks gestation
- PMID: 38906503
- PMCID: PMC11464185
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110530
Economic analysis of foregoing Rh immunoglobulin for bleeding in pregnancy <12 weeks gestation
Abstract
Objectives: To perform cost analyses of foregoing RhD blood type testing and administration of Rh immunoglobulin (RhIg) for bleeding in pregnancy at <12 weeks gestation in the United States.
Study design: We created a decision-analytic model comparing the current standard treatment pathway for patients who have threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortion in the United States, with a new pathway foregoing RhD testing and administration of RhIg for those who are RhD-negative at <12 weeks gestation, assuming that the risk of sensitization is 0%. We derived population and cost estimates from the current literature and calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to screen to avoid one case of fatal hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. We performed sensitivity analyses assuming Rh-sensitization risks of 1.5% and 3% and varying the subsequent pregnancy rates from 44% to 100%.
Results: The annual savings to health care payers in the United States of foregoing RhD testing and RhIg administration with bleeding events at <12 weeks are $5.5 million/100,000 total pregnancies, assuming the sensitization risk is 0%. In sensitivity analyses with a sensitization risk of 1.5% and subsequent pregnancy rate of 84.3% foregoing Rh testing and RhIg administration would save $2.8 million/100,000 pregnancies, with a NNT of 7322 and a number needed to screen of 48,816. At a 3% sensitization rate, the current standard treatment pathway is most economical.
Conclusions: There is an opportunity to save as much as $5.5 million/100,000 pregnancies by withholding RhIg in specific situations and conserving it for use later in pregnancy.
Implications: Cost analyses support foregoing RhD blood type screening and RhIg administration at <12 weeks gestation if the sensitization rate is <3%. By deimplementing this low-value care, payers in the United States can save as much as $5.5 million/100,000 pregnancies and conserve RhIg for use later in pregnancy.
Keywords: Abortion; Cost; Early pregnancy loss; Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn; Rh immunoglobulin; RhD sensitization.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Costs and benefits of non-invasive fetal RhD determination.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;45(1):84-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.14723. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25380024
-
Noninvasive Fetal RhD Blood Group Genotyping: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Nov 2;20(15):1-160. eCollection 2020. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020. PMID: 33240456 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Rhesus D Immune Globulin in Early Pregnancy: A Clinical Review.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2025 Jun;52(2):207-218. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2024.12.012. Epub 2025 Feb 6. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2025. PMID: 40320266 Review.
-
Rh(O)D immune globulin products for prevention of alloimmunization during pregnancy.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Feb 15;72(4):267-76. doi: 10.2146/ajhp140288. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015. PMID: 25631833 Review.
-
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Statement: RhD immune globulin after spontaneous or induced abortion at less than 12 weeks of gestation.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 May;230(5):B2-B5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.02.288. Epub 2024 Feb 28. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 38417536
Cited by
-
A tale of two societies: implications of conflicting Rh-immunoglobulin guidelines.AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Jul 6;4(3):100380. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100380. eCollection 2024 Aug. AJOG Glob Rep. 2024. PMID: 39185011 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Obstetricians ACo, Gynecologists. Prevention of Rh D Alloimmunization. ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 181. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:e57–70. - PubMed
-
- Obstetricians ACo, Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 75: Management of alloimmunization during pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2006;108(2):457–64. - PubMed
-
- Wiebe ER, Campbell M, Aiken AR, Albert A. Can we safely stop testing for Rh status and immunizing Rh-negative women having early abortions? A comparison of Rh alloimmunization in Canada and the Netherlands. Contraception: X. 2019;1:100001.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources