Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 21;23(1):127.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02203-6.

"We need to confirm at least from two or three": Healthcare workers' discretion as gatekeepers in the context of the Ethiopian abortion law

Nega Jibat  1 , Getnet Tadele  2 , Haldis Haukanes  3 , Astrid Blystad  4
Affiliations

"We need to confirm at least from two or three": Healthcare workers' discretion as gatekeepers in the context of the Ethiopian abortion law

Nega Jibat et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Women's access to legal and safe abortion is a vital means to reduce unsafe abortion, which in turn is known to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality. In 2005, Ethiopia enacted a relatively permissive abortion legislation. However, there is evidence that access to abortion care services may be challenging and controversial even if progressive abortion laws are in place. This article examines women's access to abortion services from the perspective of healthcare workers in a rural setting in Ethiopia. Drawing on Lipsky's theory of street-level bureaucrats, the article discusses healthcare workers' discretion and the substantial authority they hold as gatekeepers to safe abortion services.

Methods: The study draws upon a qualitative, interpretative methodological approach, with in-depth semi-structured interviews with healthcare workers as the key method of data generation. The data was analyzed and interpreted thematically. Healthcare workers' perspectives were examined with reference to the national abortion legislation and guidelines.

Results: The findings reveal that healthcare workers make decisions on behalf of the women who seek abortion, and they involve parents and partners in abortion-related decision-making processes. Moreover, they assess the social context of the pregnancy such as the marital and economic statuses of the abortion-seeking women in ways that restrict women's access to legally-endorsed abortion services.

Conclusions: Healthcare workers' practices in this rural area were found to challenge the basic provisions laid out in Ethiopia's abortion legislation. Their negative discretion of the legislation contributes to the substantial barriers Ethiopian abortion-seeking women face in gaining access to legal abortion services, despite the presence of a progressive legal framework and guidelines.

Keywords: Abortion; Abortion law; Healthcare worker discretion; Limited access; Rural Ethiopia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blystad A, Haukanes H, Tadele G, Moland KM. Reproductive health and the politics of abortion. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19:1–4. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-1157-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Purcell C. The sociology of women’s abortion experiences: recent research and future directions. Sociol Compass. 2015;9:585–96. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12275. - DOI
    1. Grimes DA, Benson J, Singh S, Romero M, Ganatra B, Okonofua FE. Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic *. October; 2006. - PubMed
    1. FDRE. Proclamation No.414/2004: The Criminal Code of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. Negarita Gazeta. 2004;:182–3. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/et/et011en.pdf.
    1. Elul B. Determinants of induced abortion: an analysis of individual, household and contextual factors in Rajasthan, India. J Biosoc Sci. 2011;43:1–17. doi: 10.1017/S0021932010000490. - DOI - PubMed