Indirect blood pressure measurements: a matter of interpretation
- PMID: 389102
- DOI: 10.1177/000331977903001005
Indirect blood pressure measurements: a matter of interpretation
Abstract
The indirect measurement of arterial blood pressure is discussed from the standpoint of the intravascular phenomena that occur under the cuff during the production of Korotkoff sounds. The influence of the physical and elastic properties of the vessel wall and blood flow parameters on indirect blood pressure measurement were investigated by using the results of model studies carried out in a properly scaled, simulated mechanical system under controlled conditions. The results of those studies indicate that auscultatory readings may be subject to large errors, depending on the thickness and stiffness of the artery wall. These results are shown to be consistent with comparisons of direct and indirect blood pressures in human subjects in that errors of the order of 30 to 50 mm Hg are not uncommon in the elderly or in patients with advanced arteriosclerosis. The errors discussed here are inherent to the auscultatory technique and are not related to instrument calibration, auditory acuity, or office technique.
Similar articles
-
Biases in the measurement of arterial pressure.Crit Care Med. 1984 Nov;12(11):965-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198411000-00009. Crit Care Med. 1984. PMID: 6499482
-
Auscultatory measurement of arterial pressure during anaesthesia: a reassessment of Korotkoff sounds.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1985 Mar;2(1):11-20. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1985. PMID: 4018039
-
The origin of Korotkoff sounds and the accuracy of auscultatory blood pressure measurements.J Am Soc Hypertens. 2015 Dec;9(12):935-50.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2015.09.011. Epub 2015 Sep 25. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2015. PMID: 26553392
-
Clinical measurement of arterial stiffness obtained from noninvasive pressure waveforms.Am J Hypertens. 2005 Jan;18(1 Pt 2):3S-10S. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.10.009. Am J Hypertens. 2005. PMID: 15683725 Review.
-
The measurement of blood pressure and its interpretation.Prim Care. 1980 Dec;7(4):637-51. Prim Care. 1980. PMID: 7010403 Review.
Cited by
-
Underestimation of systolic pressure in cuff-based blood pressure measurement.PNAS Nexus. 2025 Aug 12;4(8):pgaf222. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf222. eCollection 2025 Aug. PNAS Nexus. 2025. PMID: 40799351 Free PMC article.
-
A Meta-analysis to Determine the Validity of Taking Blood Pressure Using the Indirect Cuff Method.Curr Hypertens Rep. 2019 Feb 7;21(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s11906-019-0929-8. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2019. PMID: 30729320
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources