Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun:5:100383.
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100383.

A qualitative exploration of reproductive coercion experiences and perceptions in four geo-culturally diverse sub-Saharan African settings

Haley L Thomas  1 , Suzanne O Bell  1 , Celia Karp  1 , Elizabeth Omoluabi  2 , Simon P S Kibira  3 , Frederick Makumbi  3 , Hadiza Galadanci  4 , Solomon Shiferaw  5 , Assefa Seme  5 , Caroline Moreau  1   6 , Shannon N Wood  1
Affiliations

A qualitative exploration of reproductive coercion experiences and perceptions in four geo-culturally diverse sub-Saharan African settings

Haley L Thomas et al. SSM Qual Res Health. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Reproductive coercion (RC) is any intentional behavior that interferes with another's reproductive decision-making or pregnancy outcome. This study aims to qualitatively examine RC experiences and perceptions among women and men in Ethiopia, Nigeria (Kano and Anambra States), and Uganda. This is a secondary analysis utilizing qualitative data from the Women's and Girls' Empowerment in Sexual and Reproductive Health study. Across sites, focus group discussions (38 groups; n=320 participants) and in-depth interviews (n=120) were conducted, recorded, and transcribed. Transcripts were loaded into Atlas.ti, and quotes describing experiences of reproductive control or abuse were coded as "reproductive coercion." RC quotes were input into a matrix for thematic analysis. Emergent RC themes included indirect reproductive pressures, direct family planning interference, concurrent experiences of violence, and responses to RC. Indirect reproductive pressures included tactics to both promote and prevent pregnancy, while direct interference centered on pregnancy promotion. Women who were not compliant with their partners' reproductive demands were often subjected to violence from multiple actors (i.e., parents, in-laws, community members) in addition to their partners. Despite concurrent forms of violence, women across sites resisted RC by using contraceptives covertly, choosing to abort, or leaving their abusive partnerships. Women and men across sites indicated that men were highly influential in fertility. RC behaviors were a mechanism of control over desired reproductive outcomes, which were often rooted in perceptions of childbearing as social status. Findings indicate a need for more nuanced community interventions targeting social norms, as well as improved RC screening and response within health services.

Keywords: Contraception; Couples; Qualitative research; Reproductive coercion; Reproductive health; Sub-Saharan Africa.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

    1. Ahinkorah B.O. Polygyny and intimate partner violence in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from 16 cross-sectional demographic and health surveys. SSM - Popul. Health. 2021;13 doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100729. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexander K.A., Sanders R.A., Grace K.T., Thorpe R.J., Doro E., Bowleg L. ‘Having a child meant I had a real life’: Reproductive coercion and childbearing motivations among young black men living in baltimore. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2021;36(17–18):NP9197–NP9225. doi: 10.1177/0886260519853400. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boyce S.C., Uysal J., DeLong S.M., Carter N., Undie C.-C., Liambila W., et al. Women's and girls' experiences of reproductive coercion and opportunities for intervention in family planning clinics in Nairobi, Kenya: A qualitative study. Reproductive Health. 2020;17(1) doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00942-7. Article 1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caldwell J.C. The demographic implications of West African family systems. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 1996;27(2):331–352.
    1. Camp A.R. SSRN Electronic Journal; 2014. Coercing pregnancy. - DOI