Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun 20;13(3):e0302.
doi: 10.1097/XCE.0000000000000302. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Efficacy and outcomes of bempedoic acid versus placebo in patients with hypercholesterolemia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations
Review

Efficacy and outcomes of bempedoic acid versus placebo in patients with hypercholesterolemia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Aman Goyal et al. Cardiovasc Endocrinol Metab. .

Abstract

Introduction: Bempedoic acid (BA) has shown varied efficacy in managing hyperlipidemia. We conducted the most extensive up-to-date meta-analysis, the first to include recent studies by Nissen et al., which boast the largest sample size.

Methods: Literature search was done on Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. The primary endpoint was a change in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, while secondary endpoints encompassed changes in lipid parameters, clinical endpoints, and safety endpoints. The least-square mean (LSM) percent change was utilized for lipid changes, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05.

Results: This analysis included 12 randomized control trials with 22,249 participants. BA exhibited a substantial reduction in LDL-C levels [LSM % change, -24.34; 95% confidence interval (CI), -27.80 to -20.88; P < 0.0001], total cholesterol levels (LSM % change, -16.62; 95% CI, -21.70 to -11.54; P < 0.00001) and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels (LSM % change, -4.22; 95% CI, -5.51 to -2.92; P < 0.00001) compared to the placebo.

Conclusions: BA significantly lowers LDL-C, total cholesterol, HDL-C, non-HDL-C, high sensitivity C reactive protein, and apolipoprotein levels.

Keywords: bempedoic acid; cardiovascular outcomes; coronary artery disease; hyperlipidemia; meta-analysis; prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) flow diagram for identification of studies included in the meta-analysis.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Individual and pooled analysis for lipid parameters illustrating the efficacy of BA compared to placebo therapy in terms of lipid parameters. The mean difference and risk ratio (RR) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) are displayed using a logarithmic scale, with the box size scaling in accordance with the sample size. The diamond symbolizes the combined or overall effect. (a) LDL mean percent change (ungrouped). (b) LDL mean percent change (subgroup analysis). (c) TC (ungrouped). (d) TC (subgrouped). (e) Non-HDL-C (ungrouped). (f) Non-HDL-C (subgrouped). (g) hsCRP (ungrouped). (h) hsCRP (subgrouped). (i) HDL-C. (j) ApoB (ungrouped). (k) ApoB (subgrouped). (l) Triglycerides. Apo B, abetalipoprotein B; BA, bempedoic acid; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein- cholesterol; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; TC, total cholesterol.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Individual and pooled analysis illustrating the clinical efficacy of BA compared to placebo therapy in terms of the clinical endpoints. The mean difference and risk ratio (RR) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) are displayed using a logarithmic scale, with the box size scaling in accordance with the sample size. The diamond symbolizes the combined or overall effect. (a) Coronary revascularization. (b) Noncoronary revascularization. (c) MI. (d) Hospitalization for unstable angina. (e) MACE. (f) ACM. (g) Cardiovascular-related mortality. (h) Hospitalization for heart failure. (i) Stroke. ACM, all-cause mortality; BA, bempedoic acid; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; MI, myocardial infarction.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Individual and pooled analysis illustrating the efficacy of BA compared to placebo therapy in terms of the safety endpoints. The mean difference and risk ratio (RR) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) are displayed using a logarithmic scale, with the box size scaling in accordance with the sample size. The diamond symbolizes the combined or overall effect. (a) Myalgias. (b) Worsening diabetes/new-onset diabetes. (c) Gout. (d) Hyperuricemia. (e) Neurocognitive disorders. (f) Nasopharyngitis. (g) Urinary tract infection. (h) Upper respiratory infection. (i) Muscular disorders. (j) GFR decrease. BA, bempedoic acid; GFR, glomerular filtration rate.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Risk of bias assessment of included studies using the Cochrane’s risk of bias tool 2.0.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Funnel plots for visual assessment of publication bias. (a) LDL (ungrouped). (b) LDL (subgrouped). (c) TC (ungrouped). (d) TC (subgrouped). (e) Non-HDL (ungrouped). (f) Non-HDL (subgrouped). (g) HDL. (h) ApoB (ungrouped). (i) ApoB (subgrouped). (j) Triglycerides. (k) hsCRP (ungrouped). (l) hsCRP (subgrouped). (m) ACM. (n) MI. (o) Gout. (p) Hyperuricemia. (q) Muscular disorders. (r) Myalgias. (s) Coronary revascularization. (t) Noncoronary revascularization. (u) Hospitalization for heart failure. (v) Neurocognitive disorders. (w) Nasopharyngitis. (x) UTI. (y) URI. (z) Hospitalization for unstable angina. (aa) Stroke. (ab) Decrease in GFR. (ac) Worsening diabetes/hyperglycemia. (ad) Worsening diabetes/new onset diabetes. (ae) Cardiovascular-related mortality. (af) MACE. Apo B, abetalipoprotein B; ACM, all-cause mortality; BA, bempedoic acid; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein- cholesterol; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; MI, myocardial infarction; TC, total cholesterol; URI, upper respiratory tract infection; UTI, urinary tract infection.

References

    1. Pang J, Chan DC, Watts GF. The knowns and unknowns of contemporary statin therapy for familial hypercholesterolemia. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2020; 22:64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klimchak AC, Patel MY, Iorga SR, Kulkarni N, Wong ND. Lipid treatment and goal attainment characteristics among persons with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the United States. Am J Prevent Cardiol 2020; 1:100010. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, et al. . 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 2019; 139:e1082–e1143. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bardolia C, Amin NS, Turgeon J. Emerging non-statin treatment options for lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8:789931. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bytyçi I, Penson PE, Mikhailidis DP, Wong ND, Hernandez AV, Sahebkar A, et al. . Prevalence of statin intolerance: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2022; 43:3213–3223. - PMC - PubMed