Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Jul 2;26(7):euae174.
doi: 10.1093/europace/euae174.

Efficacy and safety of a novel hexaspline pulsed field ablation system in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the PLEASE-AF study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Efficacy and safety of a novel hexaspline pulsed field ablation system in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the PLEASE-AF study

Zulu Wang et al. Europace. .

Abstract

Aims: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging non-thermal ablative modality demonstrating considerable promise for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, these PFA trials have almost universally included only Caucasian populations, with little data on its effect on other races/ethnicities. The PLEASE-AF trial sought to study the 12-month efficacy and the safety of a multi-electrode hexaspline PFA catheter in treating a predominantly Asian/Chinese population of patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF.

Methods and results: Patients underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) by delivering different pulse intensities at the PV ostium (1800 V) and atrium (2000 V). Acute success was defined as no PV potentials and entrance/exit conduction block of all PVs after a 20-min waiting period. Follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months included 12-lead electrocardiogram and 24-h Holter examinations. The primary efficacy endpoint was 12-month freedom from any atrial arrhythmias lasting at least 30 s. The cohort included 143 patients from 12 hospitals treated by 28 operators: age 60.2 ± 10.0 years, 65.7% male, Asian/Chinese 100%, and left atrial diameter 36.6 ± 4.9 mm. All PVs (565/565, 100%) were successfully isolated. The total procedure, catheter dwell, total PFA application, and total fluoroscopy times were 123.5 ± 38.8 min, 63.0 ± 30.7 min, 169.7 ± 34.6 s, and 27.3 ± 10.1 min, respectively. The primary endpoint was observed in 124 of 143 patients (86.7%). One patient (0.7%) developed a small pericardial effusion 1-month post-procedure, not requiring intervention.

Conclusion: The novel hexaspline PFA catheter demonstrated universal acute PVI with an excellent safety profile and promising 12-month freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias in an Asian/Chinese population with paroxysmal AF.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05114954.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Electrophysiology; Electroporation; Pulmonary vein isolation; Pulsed field ablation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: V.Y.R. has served as consultant to and has received equity compensation from Hangzhou Dinova EP Technology Co., Ltd; and unrelated to this manuscript, he serves as a consultant for and has equity in Ablacon, Acutus Medical, Affera-Medtronic, Apama Medical-Boston Scientific, Anumana, APN Health, Aquaheart, Atacor, Autonomix, Axon Therapies, Backbeat, BioSig, CardiaCare, CardioNXT/AFTx, Circa Scientific, CoRISMA, Corvia Medical, East End Medical, EPD-Philips, EP Frontiers, Epix Therapeutics-Medtronic, EpiEP, Eximo, Farapulse-Boston Scientific, Field Medical, Focused Therapeutics, HRT, Intershunt, Javelin, Kardium, Keystone Heart, LuxMed, Medlumics, Middlepeak, Neutrace, Nuvera-Biosense Webster, Oracle Health, Restore Medical, Sirona Medical, SoundCath, Valcare; unrelated to this work, has served as a consultant for Abbott, AtriAN, Biosense-Webster, BioTel Heart, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cairdac, Cardiofocus, Cardionomic, CoreMap, Fire1, Gore & Associates, Impulse Dynamics, Medtronic, Novartis, Philips, and Pulse Biosciences; and has equity in DRS Vascular, Manual Surgical Sciences, Newpace, Nyra Medical, Surecor, and Vizaramed. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
The diagram of CardiPulse catheter tip configurations. Basket configurations (A, B, C). Flower configurations (D, E, F).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pre- and post-ablation PV potential. After one pulsed field application, disappearance of PV potentials (B) compared with pre-ablation (A).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pre- and post-ablation LA voltage maps. A and B showed antero-posterior 3D electroanatomical views of the LA pre-ablation (left panel) and post-ablation (right panel). C and D showed postero-anterior position. E and F showed right anterior oblique position. Colour purple is bipolar voltage > 0.5 mV, and colour red is bipolar voltage < 0.1 mV.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier survival curve for freedom from AF, AFL, or AT at 12 months. AF, atrial fibrillation; AFL, atrial flutter; AT, atrial tachycardia.

References

    1. Reddy VY, Neuzil P, Koruth JS, Petru J, Funosako M, Cochet H et al. Pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:315–26. - PubMed
    1. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2017;14:e275–444. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bradley CJ, Haines DE. Pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2020;31:2136–47. - PubMed
    1. Qiu J, Lan L, Wang Y. Pulsed electrical field in arrhythmia treatment: current status and future directions. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2022;45:1255–62. - PubMed
    1. Reddy VY, Koruth J, Jais P, Petru J, Timko F, Skalsky I et al. Ablation of atrial fibrillation with pulsed electric fields: an ultra-rapid, tissue-selective modality for cardiac ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2018;4:987–95. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Associated data

Grants and funding