Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy/adjuvant pembrolizumab for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: quality-of-life results from the randomized KEYNOTE-522 study
- PMID: 38913881
- PMCID: PMC11461162
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae129
Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy/adjuvant pembrolizumab for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: quality-of-life results from the randomized KEYNOTE-522 study
Abstract
Background: In KEYNOTE-522 (NCT03036488), neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and then adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved pathological complete response and event-free survival vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We report patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from KEYNOTE-522.
Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks, plus 4 cycles of paclitaxel plus carboplatin and then 4 cycles of doxorubicin (or epirubicin) plus cyclophosphamide. After surgery, patients received adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo for up to 9 cycles. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC Breast Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-BR23) were prespecified secondary objectives. Between-group differences in least squares (LS) mean change from baseline (day 1 of cycle 1 in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant phases) to the prespecified latest time point with at least 60% completion and at least 80% compliance were assessed using a longitudinal model (no alpha error assigned).
Results: Week 21 (neoadjuvant phase) and week 24 (adjuvant phase) were the latest time points at which completion/compliance rates were ≥60%/80%. In the neoadjuvant phase, between-group differences (pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy [n = 762] vs placebo plus chemotherapy [n = 383]) in LS mean change from baseline to week 21 in QLQ-C30 global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL), emotional functioning, and physical functioning were -1.04 (95% confidence interval = -3.46 to 1.38), -0.69 (95% CI = -3.13 to 1.75), and -2.85 (95% CI = -5.11 to -0.60), respectively. In the adjuvant phase, between-group differences (pembrolizumab [n = 539] vs placebo [n = 308]) in LS mean change from baseline to week 24 were -0.41 (95% CI = -2.60 to 1.77), -0.60 (95% CI = -2.99 to 1.79), and -1.57 (95% CI = -3.36 to 0.21).
Conclusions: No substantial differences in PRO assessments were observed between neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab vs neoadjuvant placebo plus chemotherapy in early-stage TNBC.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03036488.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
The "PRO"mise and "PRO"gress of PROs in cancer clinical trials.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Oct 1;116(10):1544-1546. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae157. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024. PMID: 39081236 No abstract available.
References
-
- Howlader N, Cronin KA, Kurian AW, Andridge R.. Differences in breast cancer survival by molecular subtypes in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018;27(6):619-626. - PubMed
-
- National Cancer Institute. Cancer Stat Facts: Female Breast Cancer Subtypes. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast-subtypes.html. Accessed December 13, 2022.
-
- Haiderali A, Rhodes WC, Gautam S, et al.Real-world treatment patterns and effectiveness outcomes in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer. Future Oncol. 2021;17(29):3819-3831. - PubMed
-
- Schmid P, Salgado R, Park YH, et al.Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment of high-risk, early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: results from the phase 1b open-label, multicohort KEYNOTE-173 study. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(5):569-581. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
