Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Oct;30(10):2849-2856.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03133-0. Epub 2024 Jun 24.

Effects of semaglutide with and without concomitant SGLT2 inhibitor use in participants with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease in the FLOW trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of semaglutide with and without concomitant SGLT2 inhibitor use in participants with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease in the FLOW trial

Johannes F E Mann et al. Nat Med. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

People with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease have a high risk for kidney failure and cardiovascular (CV) complications. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) independently reduce CV and kidney events. The effect of combining both is unclear. FLOW trial participants with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease were stratified by baseline SGLT2i use (N = 550) or no use (N = 2,983) and randomized to semaglutide/placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of kidney failure, ≥50% estimated glomerular filtration rate reduction, kidney death or CV death. The risk of the primary outcome was 24% lower in all participants treated with semaglutide versus placebo (95% confidence interval: 34%, 12%). The primary outcome occurred in 41/277 (semaglutide) versus 38/273 (placebo) participants on SGLT2i at baseline (hazard ratio 1.07; 95% confidence interval: 0.69, 1.67; P = 0.755) and in 290/1,490 versus 372/1,493 participants not taking SGLT2i at baseline (hazard ratio 0.73; 0.63, 0.85; P < 0.001; P interaction 0.109). Three confirmatory secondary outcomes were predefined. Treatment differences favoring semaglutide for total estimated glomerular filtration rate slope (ml min-1/1.73 m2/year) were 0.75 (-0.01, 1.5) in the SGLT2i subgroup and 1.25 (0.91, 1.58) in the non-SGLT2i subgroup, P interaction 0.237. Semaglutide benefits on major CV events and all-cause death were similar regardless of SGLT2i use (P interaction 0.741 and 0.901, respectively). The benefits of semaglutide in reducing kidney outcomes were consistent in participants with/without baseline SGLT2i use; power was limited to detect smaller but clinically relevant effects. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03819153 .

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.F.E.M. reports grants from Novo Nordisk, the European Union and McMaster University Hamilton, Canada; consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Bayer and Boehringer Ingelheim; honoraria from Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Bayer and Novartis; and has participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Sanofi and Boehringer Ingelheim, as well as a leadership role in the KDIGO group. P.R. has received consultancy and/or speaking fees (institutional) from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi; and research grants from AstraZeneca, Bayer and Novo Nordisk. G.B. has been a consultant to or an executive committee member for a clinical trial: Bayer, KBP Biosciences, Ionis, Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk and InREGEN; and is editor for the American Journal of Nephrology. N.B., H.B.-T., T.I. and S.R. are employees and shareholders of Novo Nordisk. R.B. has served on the speaker bureau for Novo Nordisk; and is a clinical investigator in several Novo Nordisk trials (for example, SUSTAIN6, SUSTAIN9, FLOW, SOUL and CagriSema). D.M.C. declares being a consultant for Allena Pharmaceuticals (DSMB), AstraZeneca, CSL Behring, Eli Lilly/Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, GSK, LG Chemical, Medtronic, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Renalytix and Zogenix; has received research funding from Amgen and Medtronic, and clinical trial support from Eli Lilly/Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead and Novo Nordisk; has patents or royalties from UpToDate.com for authorship/editorials on reviews; has provided advisory or leadership roles for CJASN; and has received expert witness fees related to proton pump inhibitors. S.H. has received grants from Asdia, AstraZeneca, LVL, Nestle Homeperf, ISIS Diabète, Pierre Fabre and VitalAire; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Servier and Valbiotis; payment or honoraria from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Dino Santé, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Servier and Valbiotis; and support to attend meetings from AstraZeneca, Abbott, Dino Santé, Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk. P.G. serves or has served on advisory panels for Abbott, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Roche and Sanofi, with financial compensation for these activities received by KU Leuven; serves or has served on the speakers bureau for Abbott, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dexcom, Insulet, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Roche and VitalAire, with financial compensation for these activities received by KU Leuven; and KU Leuven has received nonfinancial support for P.G. for travel from A. Menarini Diagnostics, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi and Roche. J.L.G. declares funding to conduct clinical trials from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim and Novo Nordisk (all to the INCLIVA Research Institute); consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim and Novo Nordisk; and payment of honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Menarini and Novo Nordisk. L.J. has received consulting/lecture fees from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi; and payment of honoraria for lectures from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi; and support to attend meetings from Bayer, Eli Lilly, Merck, MSD and Novo Nordisk. K.W.M. has received grants from AHA, Apple, Bayer, California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, CSL Behring, Eidos, Ferring, Gilead, Google (Verify), Idorsia, Johnson & Johnson, Luitpold, Novartis, PAC-12, Precordior and Sanifit; and consulting fees from Applied Therapeutics, Bayer, BMS, BridgeBio, CSL Behring, Elsevier, Fosun Pharma, Human, Johnson & Johnson, Moderna, Myokardia, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Phasebio, Portola, Quidel, and Theravance; and has equity in Human, Medeloop, Precordior, and Regencor. V.P. has received honoraria for steering committee, data monitoring committee or advisory board roles or for scientific presentations from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chinook, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Otsuka, Travere, Tricida and UptoDate; and is a Board Director for George Clinical, St. Vincents Health Australia, and several independent medical research institutes. R.E.S. has received grants to the Institution from Amgen, Ablative Solution, Bayer, IPPmed, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk and Recor; and honoraria as a speaker and advisor from Ablative Solutions, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Medtronic, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Recor, Servier and TAD. R.E.P. declares speaker fees from Lilly and Novo Nordisk; consulting fees from Bayer AG, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Endogenex, Gasherbrum Bio, Genprex, Getz Pharma, Intas Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries; and research grants from Biomea Fusion, Carmot Therapeutics, Dompe, Endogenex, Fractyl, Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi. K.R.T. has received grants from Bayer and Travere Therapeutics (institutional); consulting fees and honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus and educational events from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company and Novo Nordisk; provides unpaid participation as the Data Safety Monitoring Board Chair for the George Clinical Institute, and NIDDK/NIH; and is also the Diabetic Kidney Disease Collaborative Chair for the American Society of Nephrology.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Outcomes for semaglutide 1.0 mg versus placebo in subgroups with/without SGLT2i use at baseline for the primary five-component outcome and for the kidney-specific, four-component outcome.
a, For the primary five-component outcome, cumulative incidence rates were calculated using the Aalen–Johansen method with non-CV and non-renal death as a competing risk. b, For the kidney-specific, four-component outcome (five-component outcome without CV death), cumulative incidence rates were calculated using the Aalen–Johansen method with all-cause death, excluding renal death, as a competing risk. A stratified Cox proportional hazards model was used (stratified by SGLT2i use at baseline (yes/no)), with treatment and subgroup as fixed factors and two-sided P values. In a, the P value for semaglutide versus placebo in participants on SGLT2i at baseline was 0.7546, and for those not on SGLT2i, it was <0.0001; the P interaction value was 0.1090.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. The composite primary outcome and its components, and MACE and all-cause death outcomes.
Data from the in-trial period (full analysis set). Data are presented as HR (blue symbol) and corresponding 95% CI (error bars). Time from randomization to relevant endpoint was analyzed using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model with treatment as a categorical fixed factor and two-sided P values. Participants without events of interest were censored at the end of their in-trial period. For the subgroup analyses, estimated HR and corresponding CI were calculated in a Cox proportional hazards model with interaction between treatment groups and subgroup as a fixed factor. P interaction values for the test of no interaction effect between SGLT2i use and treatment using a score test are shown. There was no renal death in the SGLT2i use subgroup, which is not displayed here. MI, myocardial infarction.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. eGFR over time with or without SGLT2i use at baseline, based on serum creatinine and cystatin C.
ad, Observed data from the in-trial period. eGFR-creatinine in subgroup with SGLT2i use at baseline (a), eGFR-creatinine in subgroup without SGLT2i use at baseline (b), eGFR-cystatin C in subgroup with SGLT2i use at baseline (c) and eGFR-cystatin C in subgroup without SGLT2i use at baseline (d). Error bars are ± s.e.m. Numbers shown under the plots represent the number of participants contributing to the means. s.e.m., standard error of the mean.
Extended Data Fig. 1
Extended Data Fig. 1. Participant disposition and flow.
*Five participants were randomized more than once, and one participant was excluded due to good clinical practice issues at the site. Fourteen additional withdrawals (two participants receiving semaglutide and twelve receiving placebo) were by sponsor decision, following closure of two sanctioned sites in Russia. Participants who attended the follow-up visit or died during the trial. FAS, full analysis set; SGLT2i, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors.
Extended Data Fig. 2
Extended Data Fig. 2. Compliance on randomized treatment over time by baseline SGLT2i use (participants planned to be on treatment).
The lines represent the proportion of participants compliant on treatment until the planned end-of-treatment visit. Compliance on-treatment period: all days from the date of first dose to the end of the in-trial period where a dose has been administered. The period could include non-consecutive time intervals, and the dose did not have to be the target dose. SGLT2i, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors.
Extended Data Fig. 3
Extended Data Fig. 3. Proportion of participants on SGLT2i at baseline who continued on SGLT2i during the trial.
Proportions are based upon the number of participants in the trial at a given time point. SGLT2i, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors.
Extended Data Fig. 4
Extended Data Fig. 4. Proportion of participants not on SGLT2i at baseline who started on SGLT2i during the trial (grey and blue areas).
Proportions are based upon the number of participants in the trial at a given time point. The red line indicates open-label use of GLP-1 RA. GLP-1 RA, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; SGLT2i, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors.
Extended Data Fig. 5
Extended Data Fig. 5. Time to first MACE with semaglutide or placebo according to baseline use of SGLT2i.
Cumulative incidence was calculated using the Aalen–Johansen estimator for first MACE accounting for non-CV death as a competing event. CV, cardiovascular; MACE, major adverse CV event (non fatal myocardial infarction, non fatal stroke or CV death); SGLT2i, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors.
Extended Data Fig. 6
Extended Data Fig. 6. Time to all-cause death with semaglutide or placebo according to baseline use of SGLT2i.
Cumulative incidence was calculated using the Aalen–Johansen method for all-cause death. SGLT2i, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors.
Extended Data Fig. 7
Extended Data Fig. 7. UACR over time in participants with SGLT2i use at baseline (a) or without (b).
Observed data from the in-trial period. Error bars are +/– the standard error of the mean on the logarithmic scale back-transformed to natural scale with the exponential. Numbers shown in the lower panel represent the number of participants contributing to the means. SGLT2i, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors; UACR, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio.
Extended Data Fig. 8
Extended Data Fig. 8. Most frequent serious adverse events by baseline SGLT2i use; by system organ class (a) and by preferred term (b).
Percentages are sorted in descending order by the frequency in the semaglutide 1.0 mg group. Most frequent was defined as the 10 most frequent terms by absolute count, where absolute count was >1 in the total population (up to 15 in case of a tie). N, number of participants in the semaglutide and placebo arms. COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; SGLT2i, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors. Note that the percentage range (abscissa) varies.

References

    1. Sattar, N. et al. Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol.9, 653–662 (2021). - PubMed
    1. Tuttle, K. R. et al. Clinical outcomes by albuminuria status with dulaglutide versus insulin glargine in participants with diabetes and CKD: AWARD-7 exploratory analysis. Kidney3602, 254–262 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nuffield Department of Population Health Renal Studies Group. SGLT2 inhibitor Meta-Analysis Cardio-Renal Trialists’ Consortium. Impact of diabetes on the effects of sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors on kidney outcomes: collaborative meta-analysis of large placebo-controlled trials. Lancet400, 1788–1801 (2022). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perkovic, V. et al. Effect of semaglutide on kidney, cardiovascular, and mortality outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. N. Engl. J. Med.10.1056/NEJMoa2403347 (2024).
    1. Kristensen, S. L. et al. Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol.7, 776–785 (2019). - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data