Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Nov 1;119(11):2307-2316.
doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002904. Epub 2024 Jun 25.

No Effect of Methylnaltrexone on Acute Pancreatitis Severity: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

No Effect of Methylnaltrexone on Acute Pancreatitis Severity: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Cecilie Siggaard Knoph et al. Am J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Opioids used to manage severe pain in acute pancreatitis (AP) might exacerbate the disease through effects on gastrointestinal and immune functions. Methylnaltrexone, a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist, may counteract these effects without changing analgesia.

Methods: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial included adult patients with AP and systemic inflammatory response syndrome at 4 Danish centers. Patients were randomized to receive 5 days of continuous intravenous methylnaltrexone (0.15 mg/kg/d) or placebo added to the standard of care. The primary end point was the Pancreatitis Activity Scoring System score after 48 hours of treatment. Main secondary outcomes included pain scores, opioid use, disease severity, and mortality.

Results: In total, 105 patients (54% men) were randomized to methylnaltrexone (n = 51) or placebo (n = 54). After 48 hours, the Pancreatitis Activity Scoring System score was 134.3 points in the methylnaltrexone group and 130.5 points in the placebo group (difference 3.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] -40.1 to 47.6; P = 0.87). At 48 hours, we found no differences between the groups in pain severity (0.0, 95% CI -0.8 to 0.9; P = 0.94), pain interference (-0.3, 95% CI -1.4 to 0.8; P = 0.55), and morphine equivalent doses (6.5 mg, 95% CI -2.1 to 15.2; P = 0.14). Methylnaltrexone also did not affect the risk of severe disease (8%, 95% CI -11 to 28; P = 0.38) and mortality (6%, 95% CI -1 to 12; P = 0.11). The medication was well tolerated.

Discussion: Methylnaltrexone treatment did not achieve superiority over placebo for reducing the severity of AP.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04743570.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Guarantor of the article: Asbjørn Mohr Drewes, MD, PhD, DMSc.

Specific author contributions: C.S.K., S.S.O., and A.M.D. had direct access to and verified the underlying data reported in this manuscript. C.S.K., M.E.C., S.N., M.B.H., M.B.M., L.B.J.N., O.T.U., J.B.F., S.S.O., and A.M.D.: conceptualization and methodology. C.S.K., M.E.C., S.N., M.B.H., M.B.M., L.B.J.N., I.M.H., C.S., C.E.L.N., A.J.A., S.P., L.S.S., O.T.U., J.B.F., S.S.O., and A.M.D.: investigation, resources, and validation. C.S.K., S.S.O., and A.M.D. supported by S.N., M.B.H., M.B.M., S.P., O.T.U., and J.B.F.: software, formal analysis, visualization, and data curation. C.S.K., S.S.O., and A.M.D.: supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition. C.S.K., S.S.O., and A.M.D.: writing—original draft. C.S.K., M.E.C., S.N., M.B.H., M.B.M., L.B.J.N., I.M.H., C.S., C.E.L.N., A.J.A., S.P., L.S.S., O.T.U., J.B.F., S.S.O., and A.M.D.: writing—review & editing including final approval.

Financial support: The study was funded by The Novo Nordisk Foundation, grant#NNF19OC0057331. The Novo Nordisk Foundation had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing the report.

Potential competing interests: None to report.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, trial identification number: NCT04743570.

Ethics: The study was approved by the North Denmark Region Committee on Health Research Ethics (Identifier: N-20200060) and the Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT identifier: 2020-002313-18) and followed the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. All participants gave written informed consent.

Data availability statement: Data that support the findings of this trial are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart for screening, recruitment, randomization, and follow-up in the trial. SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
PASS scores in the intention-to-treat population. Line graphs show means and 95% CIs (whiskers) of daily PASS scores (a) and PASS points within the 5 scoring elements (b). Data are shown for the intention-to-treat population. Missing data were imputed using the multiple imputation approach. The dashed lines separate the end of treatment and follow-up on day 14. CI, confidence interval; MED, morphine equivalent doses; PASS, Pancreatitis Activity Scoring System; SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

References

    1. Szatmary P, Grammatikopoulos T, Cai W, et al. . Acute pancreatitis: Diagnosis and treatment. Drugs 2022;82(12):1251–76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iannuzzi JP, King JA, Leong JH, et al. . Global incidence of acute pancreatitis is increasing over time: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2022;162(1):122–34. - PubMed
    1. Moggia E, Koti R, Belgaumkar AP, et al. . Pharmacological interventions for acute pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;4(4):CD011384. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu BU, Butler RK, Chen W. Factors associated with opioid use in patients hospitalized for acute pancreatitis. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2(4):e191827. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. . Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: Revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013;62(1):102–11. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data