Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Jun 25;19(6):e0298162.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298162. eCollection 2024.

The cost effectiveness of early assessment and intervention by a dedicated health and social care professional team for older adults in the emergency department compared to treatment-as-usual: Economic evaluation of the OPTI-MEND trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The cost effectiveness of early assessment and intervention by a dedicated health and social care professional team for older adults in the emergency department compared to treatment-as-usual: Economic evaluation of the OPTI-MEND trial

Dominic Trépel et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Over 65s are frequent attenders to the Emergency Department (ED) and more than half are admitted for overnight stays. Early assessment and intervention by a dedicated ED-based Health and Social Care Professionals (HSCP) team reduces ED length of stay and the risk of hospital admissions among older adults while improving patient health-related quality-of-life and satisfaction with care. This study aims to evaluate whether augmenting the treatment as usual for older adults admitted to ED is cost-effective.

Methods and findings: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), conducted alongside the OPTI-MEND randomised controlled trial of 353 patients aged ≥65 with lower urgency complaints compared the effectiveness of early assessment and intervention by a dedicated HSCP team in the ED to treatment as usual (TAU). An economic analysis estimated the average cost per older adults randomised to the HSCP team, and compared to TAU, how contact with HSCP team changed health care use, and associated total costs, and estimated the effect of HSCP on Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). Within the OPTI-MEND trial, the average cost of a contact with the HSCP team during ED attendance is estimated to be €801 per patient. Compared to TAU, the incremental QALY of intervention is 0.053 (95% CI: 0.023 to 0.0826, p<0.0001). Accounting for cost savings because of contact with HSCP team, the average incremental saving in the total cost, compared to TAU, is -€6,128 (95% CI: -€9,217 to -€3,038, p<0.0001). Given the incremental health gains and significant cost savings, bootstrapped cost CEA suggests that dedicated HSCP care dominates over TAU for low urgency older adults attending the ED.

Conclusions: A dedicated HSCP team in the ED significantly improves overall health for lower acuity older adults and, by reducing inpatient length of stay, results in staggering cost savings. This economic evaluation conducted on the OPTI-MEND trial provides convincing evidence that HSCP should be adopted as part of treatment as usual in Irish EDs.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03739515; registered on 12th November 2018. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03739515.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. CONSORT 2010 flow diagram.
In contrast the clinical effectiveness analysis [3], this diagram specifically explains data available for use in complete case cost effectiveness analysis.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Cost-effectiveness plane showing uncertainty in the joint distribution of cost and QALYs that surround the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

References

    1. van Tiel S, Rood PP, Bertoli-Avella AM, Erasmus V, Haagsma J, van Beeck E, et al.. Systematic review of frequent users of emergency departments in non-US hospitals: state of the art. European journal of emergency medicine. 2015;22(5):306–15. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000242 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Soril LJ, Leggett LE, Lorenzetti DL, Noseworthy TW, Clement FM. Characteristics of frequent users of the emergency department in the general adult population: a systematic review of international healthcare systems. Health policy. 2016;120(5):452–61. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.02.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cassarino M, Robinson K, Trépel D, O’Shaughnessy Í, Smalle E, White S, et al.. Impact of assessment and intervention by a health and social care professional team in the emergency department on the quality, safety, and clinical effectiveness of care for older adults: A randomised controlled trial. PLoS Medicine. 2021;18(7):e1003711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003711 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Driesen BE, Van Riet BH, Verkerk L, Bonjer HJ, Merten H, Nanayakkara PW. Long length of stay at the emergency department is mostly caused by organisational factors outside the influence of the emergency department: A root cause analysis. PloS one. 2018;13(9):e0202751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202751 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hughes JM, Freiermuth CE, Shepherd‐Banigan M, Ragsdale L, Eucker SA, Goldstein K, et al.. Emergency department interventions for older adults: a systematic review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2019;67(7):1516–25. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15854 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data