Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024:1455:227-256.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-60183-5_13.

Probing Beat Perception with Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) in Human Adults, Newborns, and Nonhuman Primates

Affiliations
Review

Probing Beat Perception with Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) in Human Adults, Newborns, and Nonhuman Primates

Fleur L Bouwer et al. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024.

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to give an overview of how the perception of rhythmic temporal regularity such as a regular beat in music can be studied in human adults, human newborns, and nonhuman primates using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). First, we discuss different aspects of temporal structure in general, and musical rhythm in particular, and we discuss the possible mechanisms underlying the perception of regularity (e.g., a beat) in rhythm. Additionally, we highlight the importance of dissociating beat perception from the perception of other types of structure in rhythm, such as predictable sequences of temporal intervals, ordinal structure, and rhythmic grouping. In the second section of the chapter, we start with a discussion of auditory ERPs elicited by infrequent and frequent sounds: ERP responses to regularity violations, such as mismatch negativity (MMN), N2b, and P3, as well as early sensory responses to sounds, such as P1 and N1, have been shown to be instrumental in probing beat perception. Subsequently, we discuss how beat perception can be probed by comparing ERP responses to sounds in regular and irregular sequences, and by comparing ERP responses to sounds in different metrical positions in a rhythm, such as on and off the beat or on strong and weak beats. Finally, we will discuss previous research that has used the aforementioned ERPs and paradigms to study beat perception in human adults, human newborns, and nonhuman primates. In doing so, we consider the possible pitfalls and prospects of the technique, as well as future perspectives.

Keywords: Auditory perception; Beat; EEG; Event-related potentials (ERPs); Meter; Mismatch negativity (MMN); Music; Prediction; Rhythm; Temporal expectations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abecasis, D., Brochard, R., Del Río, D., Dufour, A., & Ortiz, T. (2009). Brain lateralization of metrical accenting in musicians. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04766.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abecasis, D., Brochard, R., Granot, R., & Drake, C. (2005). Differential brain response to metrical accents in isochronous auditory sequences. Music Perception, 22(3), 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2005.22.3.549 - DOI
    1. Alho, K., Woods, D. L., Algazi, A., & Näätänen, R. N. (1992). Intermodal selective attention. II. Effects of attentional load on processing of auditory and visual stimuli in central space. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 82(5), 356–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(92)90005-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrea-Penna, G. M. D., Iversen, J. R., Chiba, A. A., Khalil, A. K., & Minces, V. H. (2020). One tap at a time: Correlating sensorimotor synchronization with brain signatures of temporal processing. Cerebral Cortex Communications, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgaa036 - DOI
    1. Andreou, L.-V., Griffiths, T. D., & Chait, M. (2015). Sensitivity to the temporal structure of rapid sound sequences—An MEG study. NeuroImage, 110, 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.052 - DOI - PubMed