Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 25;7(1):168.
doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01162-0.

A scoping review assessing the usability of digital health technologies targeting people with multiple sclerosis

Affiliations

A scoping review assessing the usability of digital health technologies targeting people with multiple sclerosis

Fiona Tea et al. NPJ Digit Med. .

Abstract

Digital health technologies (DHTs) have become progressively more integrated into the healthcare of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). To ensure that DHTs meet end-users' needs, it is essential to assess their usability. The objective of this study was to determine how DHTs targeting people with MS incorporate usability characteristics into their design and/or evaluation. We conducted a scoping review of DHT studies in MS published from 2010 to the present using PubMed, Web of Science, OVID Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and medRxiv. Covidence was used to facilitate the review. We included articles that focused on people with MS and/or their caregivers, studied DHTs (including mhealth, telehealth, and wearables), and employed quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods designs. Thirty-two studies that assessed usability were included, which represents a minority of studies (26%) that assessed DHTs in MS. The most common DHT was mobile applications (n = 23, 70%). Overall, studies were highly heterogeneous with respect to what usability principles were considered and how usability was assessed. These findings suggest that there is a major gap in the application of standardized usability assessments to DHTs in MS. Improvements in the standardization of usability assessments will have implications for the future of digital health care for people with MS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Study selection flow diagram.
Data extracted from Covidence. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Review papers, animal studies, unpublished trial data, conference abstracts, opinion pieces, case studies, and letters.; 2. No reported usability outcome measure; 3. Studies with data in MS patients that is not accessible, or that is presented in conjunction with co-morbidities; 4. DHT not for patient populations with MS (primary diagnosis), healthcare practitioners, formal care providers, and researchers; 5. Machine learning and AI studies to assess healthcare data for MS. κ = Cohen’s kappa value.

References

    1. Spreadbury JH, Young A, Kipps CM. A comprehensive literature search of digital health technology use in neurological conditions: review of digital tools to promote self-management and support. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24:e31929. doi: 10.2196/31929. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dillenseger A, et al. Digital biomarkers in multiple sclerosis. Brain Sci. 2021;11:1519. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111519. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ziemssen T, Haase R. Digital innovation in multiple sclerosis management. Brain Sciences. 2022;12:40. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12010040. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gromisch ES, Turner AP, Haselkorn JK, Lo AC, Agresta T. Mobile health (mHealth) usage, barriers, and technological considerations in persons with multiple sclerosis: a literature review. JAMIA Open. 2020;4:ooaa067. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa067. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marziniak M, et al. The use of digital and remote communication technologies as a tool for multiple sclerosis management: narrative review. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;5:e5. doi: 10.2196/rehab.7805. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types