Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 1;50(7):305-310.
doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000001095. Epub 2024 May 2.

Prevalence of Dry Eye Disease in Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis Candidates

Affiliations

Prevalence of Dry Eye Disease in Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis Candidates

Cristian Cartes et al. Eye Contact Lens. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of dry eye disease (DED) in laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) candidates.

Methods: A chart review of consecutive LASIK candidates who underwent full ocular surface work-up was performed, including ocular surface disease index (OSDI), noninvasive tests (noninvasive tear breakup time [ni-TBUT], tear meniscus height, lipid layer thickness, and meibography), and invasive tests (Schirmer test I, fluorescein TBUT, corneal staining, and meibomian gland [MG] expressibility). The prevalence of DED was calculated according to the Dry Eye Workshop II (DEWS II), and Japanese and Asia Dry Eye Society (JDES/ADES) criteria.

Results: In total, 135 patients (270 eyes) were evaluated. The mean age was 32.6±8.3 years, and 62.9% were women (n=85); 19 patients (15.4%) wore contact lenses, and 31 patients (23.8%) used artificial tears. The mean OSDI was 18.2±16.9, which was abnormal in 54.1% (n=62). Inferior lid MG dropout was the sign with the highest percentage of abnormal results (61.5%; n=83). There were no differences between men and women in any test except for ni-TBUT (6.3±0.3 and 7.2±0.2, respectively; P=0.002). Dry eye disease prevalence was 25.9% and 53.3%, according to JDES/ADES and DEWS II criteria, respectively. The only significant risk factor for DED was artificial tear use for both DEWS II (odds ratio [OR]=3.5, confidence interval [CI] [1.35-9.39]) and JDES/ADES (OR=2.58, CI [1.03-6.48]).

Conclusions: This study found a high prevalence of DED and abnormalities in LASIK candidates and highlights the importance of ocular surface evaluation before photorefractive surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eydelman M, Hilmantel G, Tarver ME, et al. Symptoms and satisfaction of patients in the patient-reported outcomes with laser in situ keratomileusis (PROWL) studies. JAMA Ophthalmol 2017;135:13–22.
    1. Toda I. Dry eye after LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2018;59:DES109–DES115.
    1. Chao C, Golebiowski B, Stapleton F. The role of corneal innervation in lasik-induced neuropathic dry eye. Ocul Surf 2014;12:32–45.
    1. Starr CE, Gupta PK, Farid M, et al. An algorithm for the preoperative diagnosis and treatment of ocular surface disorders. J Cataract Refract Surg 2019;45:669–684.
    1. Levitt AE, Galor A, Small L, et al. Pain sensitivity and autonomic nervous system parameters as predictors of dry eye symptoms after LASIK. Ocul Surf 2021;19:275–281.