Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 1;32(3):416-425.
doi: 10.5737/23688076323416. eCollection 2022 Summer.

Coping style and typology of perceived social support of male partners of women with breast cancer

Affiliations

Coping style and typology of perceived social support of male partners of women with breast cancer

Terry Cheng et al. Can Oncol Nurs J. .

Abstract

This article reports on one component of an exploratory qualitative study, namely male partners' coping style of self-reliance, and the perceived social support that these partners relied upon to cope with their wife's breast cancer. Data were drawn from a larger study designed to explore male partners' perceived needs and the services they preferred to address these needs following their wife's diagnosis of breast cancer. The 27 male partners participating in this study were significantly affected by their wife's breast cancer. To cope, they relied on a coping style of self-reliance, drawing upon their own internal resources (self reliance) augmented by available informal social support to support themselves, their wife, and their family, and to manage the disease-, individual-, couple- and family-related stressors in their lives. Attention needs to be given to the self-support and social support needs of spouses to address unmet needs and facilitate coping. As the main providers of support for their wives, partners are in the unique position of needing support as well as providing it.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTING INTERESTS The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Recruitment Process

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Balfe M, Keohane K, O’Brien K, Sharp L. Social networks, social support and social negativity: A qualitative study of head and neck cancer caregivers’ experiences. European Journal of Cancer Care. 2017 doi: 10.1111/ecc.12619. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bamgboje-Ayodele A, Levesque JV, Gergesa M, Girgis A. The male perspective: A mixed methods study of the impact, unmet needs and challenges of caring for women with breast cancer. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 2021;39(2):235–251. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2020.1850600. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bigatti SM, Brown LF, Steiner JL, Miller KD. Breast cancer in a wife: How a husband cope and how well it works. Cancer Nursing. 2011a;34(3):193–201. - PubMed
    1. Bigatti SM, Brown LF, Steiner JL, Miller KD. Coping with breast cancer in a wife. Cancer Nursing. 2011b;34(3):193–201. - PubMed
    1. Bigatti SM, Wagner CD, Lydon-Lam JR, Steiner JL, Miller KD. Depression in husbands of breast cancer patients: Relationships to coping and social support. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2011;19:455–466. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources