Comparison of Ciprofol-Based and Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Microvascular Decompression of Facial Nerve with Neurophysiological Monitoring: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial
- PMID: 38919963
- PMCID: PMC11198000
- DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S459618
Comparison of Ciprofol-Based and Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Microvascular Decompression of Facial Nerve with Neurophysiological Monitoring: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial
Abstract
Purpose: Ciprofol is a recently developed short-acting gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor agonist with a higher potency than that of propofol. As a new sedative drug, there are few clinical studies on ciprofol. We sought to examine the safety and efficacy of ciprofol use for general anesthesia in neurosurgical individuals undergoing neurosurgical surgery with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM).
Patients and methods: This single-center, non-inferiority, single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted from September 13, 2022 to September 22, 2023. 120 patients undergoing elective microvascular decompression surgery (MVD) with IONM were randomly assigned to receive either ciprofol or propofol. The primary outcome of this study was the amplitude of intraoperative compound muscle action potential decline, and the secondary outcome included the indexes related to neurophysiological monitoring and anesthesia outcomes.
Results: The mean values of the primary outcome in the ciprofol group and the propofol group were 64.7±44.1 and 53.4±35.4, respectively. Furthermore, the 95% confidence interval of the difference was -25.78 to 3.12, with the upper limit of the difference being lower than the non-inferiority boundary of 6.6. Ciprofol could achieve non-inferior effectiveness in comparison with propofol in IONM of MVD. The result during anesthesia induction showed that the magnitude of the blood pressure drop and the incidence of injection pain in the ciprofol group were significantly lower than those in the propofol group (P<0.05). The sedative drug and norepinephrine consumption in the ciprofol group was significantly lower than that in the propofol group (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Ciprofol is not inferior to propofol in the effectiveness and safety of IONM and the surgical outcome. Concurrently, ciprofol is more conducive to reducing injection pain and improving hemodynamic stability, which may be more suitable for IONM-related surgery, and has a broad application prospect.
Keywords: abnormal muscle response; anesthetics; ciprofol; microvascular decompression.
© 2024 Zhu et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Postoperative quality of recovery comparison between ciprofol and propofol in total intravenous anesthesia for elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic major abdominal surgery: A randomized, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.J Clin Anesth. 2024 Dec;99:111660. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111660. Epub 2024 Oct 18. J Clin Anesth. 2024. PMID: 39426369 Clinical Trial.
-
Bispectral Index-Monitored Anesthesia Induction in Older Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery: Comparing Ciprofol and Propofol in a Prospective, Single-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024 Nov 5;18:4993-5003. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S484532. eCollection 2024. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024. PMID: 39525043 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ciprofol and propofol for ERCP anesthesia in older patients: A single-center randomized controlled clinical study.J Clin Anesth. 2024 Dec;99:111609. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111609. Epub 2024 Sep 16. J Clin Anesth. 2024. PMID: 39288685 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of Ciprofol compared with Propofol during general anesthesia induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT).J Clin Anesth. 2024 Jun;94:111425. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111425. Epub 2024 Feb 26. J Clin Anesth. 2024. PMID: 38412619
-
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ciprofol and propofol in sedating patients in the operating room and outside the operating room: a meta-analysis and systematic review.BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jul 2;24(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02609-3. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024. PMID: 38956515 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Pharmacological Insights and Clinical Applications of Ciprofol: A Narrative Review.Cureus. 2024 Aug 28;16(8):e68034. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68034. eCollection 2024 Aug. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39347129 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Alone versus Ciprofol with Fentanyl for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 Jun 18;19:5231-5241. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S516064. eCollection 2025. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025. PMID: 40546659 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Simons SHP, van der Lee R, Reiss IKM, et al. Clinical evaluation of propofol as sedative for endotracheal intubation in neonates. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102(11):e487–e492. - PubMed
-
- Chan VW, Chung FF. Propofol infusion for induction and maintenance of anesthesia in elderly patients: recovery and hemodynamic profiles. J Clin Anesth. 1997;8(4):317–323. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials