Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 8;14(6):488.
doi: 10.3390/bs14060488.

A Digital Math Game and Multiple-Try Use with Primary Students: A Sex Analysis on Motivation and Learning

Affiliations

A Digital Math Game and Multiple-Try Use with Primary Students: A Sex Analysis on Motivation and Learning

Claudio Cubillos et al. Behav Sci (Basel). .

Abstract

Sex differences have been a rarely addressed aspect in digital game-based learning (DGBL). Likewise, mixed results have been presented regarding the effects according to sex and the conditions that generate these effects. The present work studied the effects of a drill-and-practice mathematical game on primary students. The study focused on an analysis by sex, measuring motivation and learning in the practice activity. Also, two instructional mechanics were considered regarding the question answering to search for possible differences: a multiple-try feedback (MTF) condition and a single-try feedback (STF) condition. A total of 81 students from four courses and two schools participated in the intervention. The study's main findings were as follows: (a) the girls outperformed the boys in terms of the students' learning gains; (b) the girls presented lower levels of competence and autonomy than the boys; (c) under MTF, the girls presented lower levels of autonomy but no differences in competence contrasted with the boys; (d) under STF, the girls presented lower levels of competence but no differences in autonomy contrasted with the boys; (e) no sex differences existed in interest, effort, and value, in general, as per the instructional condition. This study enhances the knowledge of sex differences under diverse instructional settings, in particular providing insights into the possible differences by sex when varying the number of attempts provided to students.

Keywords: computer-based learning; mathematical training; multiple-try feedback; sex differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Number ordering mini-game; (b) money counting mini-game.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pre-/post-test learning differences per sex and feedback condition after controlling for the pre-test.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pre-/post-test delta values of motivational constructs per sex.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Pre-/post-test delta values of motivational constructs per sex for the MTF condition.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Pre-/post-test delta values of motivational constructs per sex for the STF condition.

References

    1. Higgins K., Huscroft-Dangelo J., Crawford L. Effects of Technology in Mathematics on Achievement, Motivation, and Attitude: A Meta-Analysis. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 2019;57:283–319. doi: 10.1177/0735633117748416. - DOI
    1. Ahuja M.K., Thatcher J.B. Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: Effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use. MIS Q. 2005;29:427–459. doi: 10.2307/25148691. - DOI
    1. Denden M., Tlili M., Essalmi F., Jemni M., Chen N.-S., Burgos D. Effects of gender and personality differences on students’ perception of game design elements in educational gamification. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2021;154:102674. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102674. - DOI
    1. Lukosch H.K., Kurapati S., Groen D., Verbraeck A. Gender and Cultural Differences in Game-Based Learning Experiences. Electron. J. E-Learn. 2017;15:310–319.
    1. Naglieri J.A., Rojahn J. Gender differences in planning, attention, simultaneous, and successive (PASS) cognitive processes and achievement. J. Educ. Psychol. 2001;93:430–437. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.430. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources