Analysis of spinopelvic parameters in adult patients with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae
- PMID: 38922415
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08378-4
Analysis of spinopelvic parameters in adult patients with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae
Abstract
Purpose: Spinopelvic sagittal alignment is crucial for assessing balance and determining treatment efficacy in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Only a limited number of reports have addressed spinopelvic parameters and lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV). Our primary objective was to study spinopelvic sagittal parameter changes in patients with LSTV. A secondary objective was to investigate clinical symptoms and quality of life (QOL) in patients with LSTV.
Methods: In this study, we investigated 371 participants who had undergone medical check-ups for the spine. LSTV was evaluated using Castellvi's classification, and patients were divided into LSTV+ (type II-IV, L5 vertebra articulated or fused with the sacrum) and LSTV- groups. After propensity score matching for demographic data, we analyzed spinopelvic parameters, sacroiliac joint degeneration, clinical symptoms, and QOL for these two participant groups. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores and EQ-5D (EuroQol 5 dimensions) indices were compared between the two groups.
Results: Forty-four patients each were analyzed in the LSTV + and LSTV- groups. The LSTV + group had significantly greater pelvic incidence (52.1 ± 11.2 vs. 47.8 ± 10.0 degrees, P = 0.031) and shorter pelvic thickness (10.2 ± 0.9 vs. 10.7 ± 0.8 cm, P = 0.018) compared to the LSTV- group. The "Sitting" domain of ODI (1.1 ± 0.9 vs. 0.6 ± 0.7, P = 0.011) and "Pain/Discomfort" domain of EQ-5D (2.0 ± 0.8 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7, P = 0.005) were larger in the LSTV + group.
Conclusion: There was a robust association between LSTV and pelvic sagittal parameters. Clinical symptoms also differed between the two groups in some domains. Surgeons should be aware of the relationship between LSTV assessment, radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms.
Keywords: Clinical symptoms; Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae; Pelvic parameters; Sagittal alignment; Spinopelvic alignment; Surgical outcome.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Influence of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae on spinopelvic parameters using biplanar slot scanning full body stereoradiography-analysis of 291 healthy volunteers.J Orthop Sci. 2022 Jul;27(4):751-759. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.03.009. Epub 2021 May 6. J Orthop Sci. 2022. PMID: 33966957
-
Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: prevalence in a southern European population and its association with low back pain.Eur Spine J. 2022 Dec;31(12):3647-3653. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07415-4. Epub 2022 Oct 8. Eur Spine J. 2022. PMID: 36208322
-
Evaluation of spinopelvic parameters in patients with lumbosacral transitional vertebra: a cross sectional and comparative study.Am J Neurodegener Dis. 2023 Aug 15;12(4):123-132. eCollection 2023. Am J Neurodegener Dis. 2023. PMID: 37736164 Free PMC article.
-
The clinical significance of lumbosacral transitional anomalies.Acta Orthop Belg. 2007 Dec;73(6):687-95. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007. PMID: 18260478 Review.
-
Risks Associated with Surgical Management of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae: Systematic Review of Surgical Considerations and Illustrative Case.World Neurosurg. 2024 Jun;186:e54-e64. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.02.033. Epub 2024 Feb 11. World Neurosurg. 2024. PMID: 38350597
Cited by
-
Sagittal balance analysis and treatment rationale for young patients with symptomatic lumbosacral transitional vertebrae.Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 26;15(1):10357. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94609-7. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40133585 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Barrey C, Roussouly P, Perrin G, Le Huec JC (2011) Sagittal balance disorders in severe degenerative spine. Can we identify the compensatory mechanisms? Eur Spine J 20 Suppl 5:626–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1930-3 - DOI
-
- Ouchida J, Nakashima H, Kanemura T et al (2023) The age-specific normative values of standing whole-body sagittal alignment parameters in healthy adults: based on international multicenter data. Eur Spine J 32:562–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07445-y - DOI - PubMed
-
- Takemoto M, Boissière L, Vital JM et al (2017) Are sagittal spinopelvic radiographic parameters significantly associated with quality of life of adult spinal deformity patients? Multivariate linear regression analyses for pre-operative and short-term post-operative health-related quality of life. Eur Spine J 26:2176–2186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4872-y - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ames CP, Smith JS, Scheer JK et al (2012) Impact of spinopelvic alignment on decision making in deformity surgery in adults: a review. J Neurosurg Spine 16:547–564. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.2.SPINE11320 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J, Marty C (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7:99–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860050038 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources