Microbiology of acute bacterial dacryocystitis: a tertiary institutional experience in South Australia
- PMID: 38922457
- PMCID: PMC11208234
- DOI: 10.1007/s10792-024-03236-0
Microbiology of acute bacterial dacryocystitis: a tertiary institutional experience in South Australia
Abstract
Purpose: To provide a comprehensive microbiological profile of bacterial dacryocystitis in South Australia. By identifying the specific microorganism and antibiotic susceptibility, this study intends to aid ophthalmologists in choosing appropriate empirical antibiotic therapies and development of evidence-based clinical guidelines.
Method: A retrospective study was conducted at the Royal Adelaide Hospital (RAH) over five years (2018-2023) of patients with acute dacryocystitis. The study included 43 patients, and data encompassed demographic information, clinical presentation, microbiological analysis, management, and outcomes. Patients with chronic dacryocystitis were excluded.
Results: Among the 43 patients included in the study (female 28 (65%), mean age: 64 years old), the most common clinical features were pain (74%) and swelling (70%). Organisms were identified in 49% of patients, with the predominant bacteria being Staphylococcus aureus (42%), Streptococcus species (19%), and Escherichia coli (8%). Aggregatibacter species (8%), Morganella morganii (4%), Enterobacter cloaceae (4%), Hafnia alvei (4%), mixed anaerobes (4%), E coliforms (4%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (4%) were also identified. The most frequently prescribed empirical antibiotics were amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (50%), flucloxacillin (33%) and cefalexin (18%).
Conclusion: The microbiological trends of acute dacryocystitis have largely remained consistent, with a predominance of Gram positive organisms. This is the most recent profile analysis of acute dacryocystitis in South Australia and will help form evidence-based clinical guidelines.
Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus; Acute dacryocystitis; Antibiotic; Sensitivity.
© 2024. Crown.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Similar articles
-
The microbiologic profile of dacryocystitis.Orbit. 2019 Feb;38(1):72-78. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2018.1466901. Epub 2018 May 11. Orbit. 2019. PMID: 29750587
-
Bacteriological profile and drug susceptibility patterns in dacryocystitis patients attending Gondar University Teaching Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.BMC Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr 2;15:34. doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0016-0. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015. PMID: 25880996 Free PMC article.
-
Bacteriological study of dacryocystitis among patients attending in Menelik II Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Ethiop Med J. 2010 Jan;48(1):29-33. Ethiop Med J. 2010. PMID: 20607995
-
Paediatric orbital and periorbital infections.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep;30(5):349-355. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000589. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 31261188 Review.
-
Pediatric Acute Dacryocystitis.Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Sep-Oct;31(5):341-7. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000472. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015. PMID: 25856337 Review.
References
-
- Bharathi MJ, Ramakrishnan R, Maneksha V, Shivakumar C, Nithya V, Mittal S (2008) Comparative bacteriology of acute and chronic dacryocystitis. Eye 22(7):953–960 - PubMed
-
- Pinar-Sueiro S, Sota M, Lerchundi TX, Gibelalde A, Berasategui B, Vilar B et al (2012) Dacryocystitis: systematic approach to diagnosis and therapy. Curr Infect Dis Rep 14(2):137–146 - PubMed
-
- Mills DM, Bodman MG, Meyer DR, Morton AD (2007) 3rd, group ADS the microbiologic spectrum of dacryocystitis: a national study of acute versus chronic infection. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 23(4):302–6 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical