Bleeding assessment following central venous catheter placement, a direct comparison of prospective and retrospective analyses
- PMID: 38923611
- DOI: 10.1111/trf.17930
Bleeding assessment following central venous catheter placement, a direct comparison of prospective and retrospective analyses
Abstract
Background: Reported bleeding incidences following central venous catheter (CVC) placement highly depend on methods of bleeding assessment. To determine the direction and magnitude of the bias associated with retrospective data collection, we used data from the PACER randomized controlled trial and a previous retrospective cohort study.
Study design and methods: A patient-level comparison of CVC-related bleeding severity was made among (1) the prospectively collected clinical bleeding assessment of the PACER trial, (2) centralized assessment of CVC insertion site photographs, and (3) retrospective chart review. Interrater reliability for photographic bleeding assessment and retrospective chart review was assessed using Cohen's κ. The magnitude of underreporting of both methods compared to prospective clinical bleeding assessment at different cutoff points of clinically relevant bleeding was assessed using McNemar's test.
Results: Interrater reliability was acceptable for both methods (κ = 0.583 and κ = 0.481 for photographic assessment and retrospective chart review, respectively). Photographic bleeding assessment led to significant underreporting of bleeding complications at all cutoff points. Retrospective chart review led to significant underreporting of minor bleeding complications, with an odds ratio (95% CI) of 0.17 (0.044-0.51) for the cutoff point grade 1 (i.e., self-limiting or requiring at most 20 min of manual compression) or higher. There was no significant underreporting of major bleeding complications with retrospective chart review.
Discussion: Centralized photographic bleeding assessment and retrospective chart review lead to biased bleeding assessment compared to prospective clinical bleeding assessment.
Keywords: central venous catheter; hemorrhage; methodology.
© 2024 The Author(s). Transfusion published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AABB.
References
REFERENCES
-
- van Baarle FEHP, van de Weerdt EK, Suurmond B, Müller MCA, Vlaar APJ, Biemond BJ. Bleeding assessment and bleeding severity in thrombocytopenic patients undergoing invasive procedures. Transfusion. 2020;60(3):637–649.
-
- Ypma PF, Kerkhoffs JLH, van Hilten JA, Middelburg RA, Coccoris M, Zwaginga JJ, et al. The observation of bleeding complications in haemato‐oncological patients: stringent watching, relevant reporting. Transfus Med. 2012;22(6):426–431.
-
- van Baarle FLF, van de Weerdt EK, van der Velden WJFM, Ruiterkamp RA, Tuinman PR, Ypma PF, et al. Platelet transfusion before CVC placement in patients with thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(21):1956–1965.
-
- van Baarle FLF, Tisheh A, Jhingoeriesingh SS, Vlaar APJ, Biemond BJ. Contribution of coagulopathy on the risk of bleeding after central venous catheter placement in critically ill thrombocytopenic patients. Crit Care Explor. 2020;4(1):e0621.
-
- Zeidler K, Arn K, Senn O, Schanz U, Stussi G. Optimal preprocedural platelet transfusion threshold for central venous catheter insertions in patients with thrombocytopenia. Transfusion. 2011;51(11):2269–2276.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical