Minimal interference of concizumab with standard clinical coagulation laboratory assays - An in vitro study
- PMID: 38924198
- DOI: 10.1111/hae.15070
Minimal interference of concizumab with standard clinical coagulation laboratory assays - An in vitro study
Abstract
Introduction: Non-factor replacement therapies are emerging as prophylactic treatment options in haemophilia A or B (HA/HB) with and without inhibitors. Concizumab is an anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) monoclonal antibody preventing factor (F)Xa inhibition and enhancing thrombin generation. Based on experience with other non-factor therapies and extended half-life products, there is a focus on potential interference with common clinical coagulation assays used to monitor patients treated with concizumab.
Aim: To evaluate the impact of concizumab on standard clinical coagulation assays.
Methods: Plasma samples (normal, HA/HB with/without inhibitors) in the presence/absence of added concizumab (250-16,000 ng/mL) were analysed in clinical assays including activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), prothrombin time (PT), FVIII and FIX one-stage clot and chromogenic substrate assay, assays for detecting FVIII or FIX inhibitors and other assays for coagulation factors.
Results: Concizumab did not impact PT assays, but resulted in a small shortening of aPTT (up to 5 s in haemophilia plasma and 0.4 s in normal plasma). Concizumab had no, or only a minor impact on FVIII and FIX activity assays or Bethesda inhibitor assays. FXI and FXII activity in normal plasma, as measured by single factor aPTT-based assay, was significantly increased in the presence of concizumab (+11% each). This was also the case for FVII and FX measured by PT-based assays using plasma with 25% of FVII or FX (+64% and +22%, respectively).
Conclusion: The presence of concizumab did not, or only slightly, influence the outcome of standard clinical coagulation assays relevant for HA and HB.
Keywords: blood coagulation tests; coagulation disorders; concizumab; haemophilia; prophylaxis.
© 2024 Novo Nordisk A/S and The Authors. Haemophilia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Müller J, Miesbach W, Prüller F, Siegemund T, Scholz U, Sachs UJ. An update on laboratory diagnostics in haemophilia A and B. Hamostaseologie. 2022;42(4):248‐260. doi:10.1055/a‐1665‐6232
-
- Adamkewicz JI, Chen DC, Paz‐Priel I. Effects and interferences of emicizumab, a humanised bispecific antibody mimicking activated factor VIII cofactor function, on coagulation assays. Thromb Haemost. 2019;119(7):1084‐1093. doi:10.1055/s‐0039‐1688687
-
- Monroe DM, Hoffman M. What does it take to make the perfect clot. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26(1):41‐48. doi:10.1161/01.Atv.0000193624.28251.83
-
- Adcock DM, Strandberg K, Shima M, Marlar RA. Advantages, disadvantages and optimization of one‐stage and chromogenic factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B. Int J Lab Hematol. 2018;40(6):621‐629. doi:10.1111/ijlh.12877
-
- Marlar RA, Strandberg K, Shima M, Adcock DM. Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one‐stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B. Eur J Haematol. 2020;104(1):3‐14. doi:10.1111/ejh.13339
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
