Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 9;67(7):2269-2282.
doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00293. Epub 2024 Jun 26.

Lexical Morphology as a Source of Risk and Resilience for Learning to Read With Dyslexia: An fNIRS Investigation

Affiliations

Lexical Morphology as a Source of Risk and Resilience for Learning to Read With Dyslexia: An fNIRS Investigation

Rachel L Eggleston et al. J Speech Lang Hear Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: We examined the neurocognitive bases of lexical morphology in children of varied reading abilities to understand the role of meaning-based skills in learning to read with dyslexia.

Method: Children completed auditory morphological and phonological awareness tasks during functional near-infrared spectroscopy neuroimaging. We first examined the relation between lexical morphology and phonological processes in typically developing readers (Study 1, N = 66, Mage = 8.39), followed by a more focal inquiry into lexical morphology processes in dyslexia (Study 2, N = 50, Mage = 8.62).

Results: Typical readers exhibited stronger engagement of language neurocircuitry during the morphology task relative to the phonology task, suggesting that morphological analyses involve synthesizing multiple components of sublexical processing. This effect was stronger for more analytically complex derivational affixes (like + ly) than more semantically transparent free base morphemes (snow + man). In contrast, children with dyslexia exhibited stronger activation during the free base condition relative to derivational affix condition. Taken together, the findings suggest that although children with dyslexia may struggle with derivational morphology, they may also use free base morphemes' semantic information to boost word recognition.

Conclusion: This study informs literacy theories by identifying an interaction between reading ability, word structure, and how the developing brain learns to recognize words in speech and print.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25944949.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study 1 left hemisphere brain activations. Direct comparisons of free base and affix conditions to phonology and affix to free base (task > rest; all false discovery rate adjusted q < .05). Light sources and detectors in the functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Probe Map are represented by squares and circles, respectively. MA = morphological awareness; PA = phonological awareness.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Study 2 brain activations and regions of interest (left middle temporal gyrus and left ventral inferior frontal gyrus) analyses. Within-group morphological awareness neuroimaging task condition comparisons for children with dyslexia and reading-matched controls. Only positive activation is displayed for all contrasts except Affix > Free Base. False discovery rate adjusted q < .05. MTG = middle temporal gyrus; vIFG = ventral inferior frontal gyrus.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Brain-behavior associations between morphological awareness behavioral task performance (Early Lexical Morphology Measure) and activation during the morphological awareness neuroimaging task (FDR adjusted q < .05). fNIRS = functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy.

References

    1. Arredondo, M. M., Ip, K. I., Shih Ju Hsu, L., Tardif, T., & Kovelman, I. (2015). Brain bases of morphological processing in young children: Brain bases of morphological abilities. Human Brain Mapping, 36(8), 2890–2900. 10.1002/hbm.22815 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aylward, E. H., Richards, T. L., Berninger, V. W., Nagy, W. E., Field, K. M., Grimme, A. C., Richards, A. L., Thomson, J. B., & Cramer, S. C. (2003). Instructional treatment associated with changes in brain activation in children with dyslexia. Neurology, 61(2), 212–219. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000068363.05974.64 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barker, J. W., Aarabi, A., & Huppert, T. J. (2013). Autoregressive model based algorithm for correcting motion and serially correlated errors in fNIRS. Biomedical Optics Express, 4(8), 1366–1379. 10.1364/BOE.4.001366 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berthiaume, R., & Daigle, D. (2014). Are dyslexic children sensitive to the morphological structure of words when they read? The case of dyslexic readers of French. Dyslexia, 20(3), 241–260. 10.1002/dys.1476 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bitan, T., Weiss, Y., Katzir, T., & Truzman, T. (2020). Morphological decomposition compensates for imperfections in phonological decoding. Neural evidence from typical and dyslexic readers of an opaque orthography. Cortex, 130, 172–191. 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.05.014 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources