Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2025 Apr;22(4):884-890.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.06.036. Epub 2024 Jun 24.

Prevalence, timing, and impact of early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias after pulsed field ablation: A secondary analysis of the PULSED AF trial

Lucas V A Boersma  1 , Andrea Natale  2 , David Haines  3 , David DeLurgio  4 , Nitesh Sood  5 , Francis Marchlinski  6 , Hugh Calkins  7 , Robert H Hoyt  8 , Prashanthan Sanders  9 , James Irwin  10 , Douglas Packer  11 , Suneet Mittal  12 , Sarfraz Durrani  13 , Luigi Di Biase  14 , Robert Sangrigoli  15 , Hiroshi Tada  16 , Tetsuo Sasano  17 , Hirofumi Tomita  18 , Teiichi Yamane  19 , Karl-Heinz Kuck  20 , Oussama Wazni  21 , Khaldoun Tarakji  22 , Jeffrey Cerkvenik  22 , Kelly A van Bragt  22 , Bob G S Abeln  23 , Atul Verma  24
Affiliations
Free article
Controlled Clinical Trial

Prevalence, timing, and impact of early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias after pulsed field ablation: A secondary analysis of the PULSED AF trial

Lucas V A Boersma et al. Heart Rhythm. 2025 Apr.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ERAT) within 3 months of thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is common and often considered transient. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a nonthermal energy source in which ERAT is not well described.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze ERAT in patients with AF undergoing PFA in the Pulsed Field Ablation to Irreversibly Electroporate Tissue and Treat AF (PULSED AF) trial.

Methods: This analysis included 154 (52.4%) paroxysmal AF and 140 (47.6%) persistent AF who had ≥10 rhythm assessments during the 90-day blanking period. ERAT was defined as any instance of ≥30 seconds of AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia on transtelephonic monitoring (weekly and symptomatic) or ≥10 seconds on electrocardiography (at 3 months), both within 90 days. Late recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (LRAT) was defined as observed atrial tachyarrhythmias between 90 days and 12 months.

Results: The overall prevalence of ERAT was 27.1% in patients with paroxysmal AF and 31.6% in patients with persistent AF. In patients with ERAT, 73% had ERAT onset within the first month of the procedure. The presence of ERAT was associated with LRAT in patients with paroxysmal AF (hazard ratio 6.4; 95% confidence interval 3.6-11.3) and patients with persistent AF (hazard ratio 3.8; 95% confidence interval 2.2-6.6). Yet, in 29.4% of patients with paroxysmal AF and 34.3% of patients with persistent AF with ERAT, LRAT was not observed. LRAT was positively correlated with the number of ERAT observations.

Conclusion: ERAT after PFA predicted LRAT in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. However, the concept of a blanking period after PFA is still valid, as approximately one-third of patients with ERAT did not continue to have LRAT during follow-up and may not need reablation.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Early recurrence; Electroporation; Pulsed field ablation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures Dr Tarakji, Mr Cerkvenik, and Dr van Bragt are employees and stockholders of Medtronic. Dr Boersma’s cardiology department receives consultation funds from Medtronic, Boston Scientific (BS), Abbott Medical (AM), Adagio Medical, and ZOLL. Dr Natale receives grants and/or consultation funds from Medtronic, Abbott, Biosense Webster (BW), Biotronik, BS, and iRhythm. Dr Haines receives grants and/or consultation funds from Medtronic. Dr DeLurgio receives grants, consultation funds, and/or honoraria funds from Medtronic, AtriCure, and BS. Dr Sood receives consultation or honoraria funds from Johnson & Johnson, Abbott, BS, AtriCure, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pfizer. Dr Marchlinski receives grants, consultation funds, and/or honoraria funds from Medtronic, BW, AM, and Biotronik. Dr Calkins receives grants, consultation funds, and/or honoraria funds from Medtronic, BS, AM, AtriCure, and BW. Dr Hoyt receives grants and/or consultation funds from Medtronic and AM. Dr Sanders receives grants, consultation funds, and/or honoraria funds from Medtronic, BS, AM, Becton Dickinson, PaceMate, and CathRx. Dr Packer receives grants and/or consultation funds from Medtronic. Dr Mittal receives consultation funds from Medtronic and BS. Dr Di Biase is a consultant for BW, Stereotaxis, and iRhythm and has received speaker honoraria/travel from BW, AM, BS, Medtronic, Biotronik, AtriCure, Siemens, and ZOLL. Dr Tada receives honoraria and/or grants from Medtronic, Daiichi Sankyo, AM, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Marubun Tsusyo, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, BS, and Novartis Pharma. Dr Tomita receives research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, BS, AM, and Biotronik and speakers’ honorarium from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, and Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Tomita is also a concurrent professor of an endowment department supported by Medtronic Japan, Japan Lifeline, and Fukuda Denshi Kitatohoku Hanbai. Dr Kuck receives grants and/or consultation funds from Medtronic and Cardiovalve. Dr Verma receives grants and/or consultation funds from Medtronic, BW, Bayer, MedLumics, Adagio Medical, and BS. The others have nothing to declare.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources