Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 30;13(6):509.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13060509.

Antibiofilm Strategies in Neonatal and Pediatric Infections

Affiliations
Review

Antibiofilm Strategies in Neonatal and Pediatric Infections

Chrysoula Kosmeri et al. Antibiotics (Basel). .

Abstract

Biofilm-related infections pose significant challenges in neonatal and pediatric care, contributing to increased morbidity and mortality rates. These complex microbial communities, comprising bacteria and fungi, exhibit resilience against antibiotics and host immune responses. Bacterial species such as Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis commonly form biofilms on medical devices, exacerbating infection risks. Neonates and children, particularly those in intensive care units, are highly susceptible to biofilm-associated infections due to the prolonged use of invasive devices, such as central lines and endotracheal tubes. Enteral feeding tubes, crucial for neonatal nutritional support, also serve as potential sites for biofilm formation, contributing to recurrent microbial contamination. Moreover, Candida species, including Candida pelliculosa, present emerging challenges in neonatal care, with multi-drug resistant strains posing treatment complexities. Current antimicrobial therapies, while important in managing infections, often fall short in eradicating biofilms, necessitating alternative strategies. The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge regarding antibiofilm strategies in neonates and in children. Novel approaches focusing on biofilm inhibition and dispersal show promise, including surface modifications, matrix-degrading enzymes, and quorum-sensing inhibitors. Prudent use of medical devices and exploration of innovative antibiofilm therapies are imperative in mitigating neonatal and pediatric biofilm infections.

Keywords: biofilms; children; infections; neonates; treatment strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The life cycle of biofilms.

References

    1. Shrestha L., Kayama S., Sasaki M., Kato F., Hisatsune J., Tsuruda K., Koizumi K., Tatsukawa N., Yu L., Takeda K., et al. Inhibitory effects of antibiofilm compound 1 against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Microbiol. Immunol. 2016;60:148–159. doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.12359. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kostakioti M., Hadjifrangiskou M., Hultgren S.J. Bacterial biofilms: Development, dispersal, and therapeutic strategies in the dawn of the postantibiotic era. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2013;3:a010306. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a010306. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Westerbeek E.A., van den Berg A., Lafeber H.N., Knol J., Fetter W.P., van Elburg R.M. The intestinal bacterial colonisation in preterm infants: A review of the literature. Clin. Nutr. 2006;25:361–368. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.03.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Høiby N., Bjarnsholt T., Givskov M., Molin S., Ciofu O. Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2010;35:322–332. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.12.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stewart P.S., Costerton J.W. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet. 2001;358:135–138. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05321-1. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources