Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 8;16(12):2178.
doi: 10.3390/cancers16122178.

A Description and Safety Overview of Irreversible Electroporation for Prostate Tissue Ablation in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: Preliminary Results from the PRESERVE Trial

Affiliations

A Description and Safety Overview of Irreversible Electroporation for Prostate Tissue Ablation in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: Preliminary Results from the PRESERVE Trial

Arvin K George et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

The PRESERVE study (NCT04972097) aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the NanoKnife System to ablate prostate tissue in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). The NanoKnife uses irreversible electroporation (IRE) to deliver high-voltage electrical pulses to change the permeability of cell membranes, leading to cell death. A total of 121 subjects with organ-confined PCa ≤ T2c, prostate-specific antigens (PSAs) ≤ 15 ng/mL, and a Gleason score of 3 + 4 or 4 + 3 underwent focal ablation of the index lesion. The primary endpoints included negative in-field biopsy and adverse event incidence, type, and severity through 12 months. At the time of analysis, the trial had completed accrual with preliminary follow-up available. Demographics, disease characteristics, procedural details, PSA responses, and adverse events (AEs) are presented. The median (IQR) age at screening was 67.0 (61.0-72.0) years and Gleason distribution 3 + 4 (80.2%) and 4 + 3 (19.8%). At 6 months, all patients with available data (n = 74) experienced a median (IQR) percent reduction in PSA of 67.6% (52.3-82.2%). Only ten subjects (8.3%) experienced a Grade 3 adverse event; five were procedure-related. No Grade ≥ 4 AEs were reported. This study supports prior findings that IRE prostate ablation with the NanoKnife System can be performed safely. Final results are required to fully assess oncological, functional, and safety outcomes.

Keywords: ablation; clinical trial; focal therapy; irreversible electroporation; prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This trial was funded by AngioDynamics, Inc. As the sponsor of this study, AngioDynamics wrote the study protocol, performed the data analysis, and made the decision to publish the results. Beyond the institutional research grants received for participation in the trial, these authors declare the following financial conflicts of interest: A.K.G.—CIVCO Medical Solutions, BK Medical, Sonablate Corporation, HIFU Prostate Services; R.M.—AngioDynamics; A.R.P.—AngioDynamics; D.J.L.—CIVCO Medical Solutions; D.Y.T.C.—Pfizer; E.M.U.—Merck, Pfizer, Janssen, CG Oncology; A.S.—AngioDynamics, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Myovant Sciences, SonaCare Medical, HIFU Prostate Services, Astellas; A.Y.—AngioDynamics; S.V.—Biobot Surgical, Intuitive Surgical, UroEssentials; W.G.B.—AngioDynamics, EDAP-TMS, Exact Imaging; T.J.P.—Astellas, Ferring, Janssen, Merck; T.D.M.—Johnson and Johnson, General Electric, Boston Scientific, Francis Medical; and J.A.C.—Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Median (IQR) PSA by Timepoint. Circles–point estimate of PSA; Squares/solid lines–IQR; Dotted lines–trend line across visits.

References

    1. SEER Cancer Stat Facts: Prostate Cancer. [(accessed on 23 April 2024)]; Available online: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/prost.html.
    1. Mottet N., Cornford P., van den Bergh R.C.N., Briers E., Eberli D., De Meerleer G., De Santis M., Gillessen S., Grummet J., Henry A.M., et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. European Association of Urology; Arnhem, The Netherlands: 2023.
    1. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Prostate Cancer. NCCN; Plymouth, PA, USA: 2024. Version 4.2024.
    1. Ong X.R.S., Bagguley D., Yaxley J.W., Azad A.A., Murphy D.G., Lawrentschuk N. Understanding the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer. Med. J. Aust. 2020;213:424–429. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50820. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang A.Z., Lebastchi A.H., O’Connor L.P., Ahdoot M., Mehralivand S., Yerram N., Taneja S.S., George A.K., Sanchez-Salas R., Ward J.F., et al. Making a case “for” focal therapy of the prostate in intermediate risk prostate cancer: Current perspective and ongoing trials. World J. Urol. 2021;39:729–739. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03525-0. - DOI - PubMed