Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun 9;13(12):3385.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13123385.

Robotic Surgery for Elective Repair of Visceral and Renal Artery Aneurysms: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Robotic Surgery for Elective Repair of Visceral and Renal Artery Aneurysms: A Systematic Review

Luigi Federico Rinaldi et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background: The treatment choice of visceral artery aneurysms in an elective setting is debated. The durability and the risk of reintervention with endovascular treatment are still reasons for concern, whereas open surgery is invasive and burdened by major complications. In anecdotal reports and isolated studies, robotic-assisted surgery seems to provide the possibility of a minimally invasive treatment and the durability of traditional open surgery, but the literature supporting this view is scarce. This review aims to collect the results of robotic-assisted surgery in the treatment of visceral artery aneurysms. Methods: A systematic search of the main research databases was performed: the study endpoints were mortality and conversion rates, perioperative morbidity, and freedom from late complications and reinterventions. Results: We identified 16 studies on 53 patients. All cases underwent successful resection, with three conversions to laparoscopy. Perioperative and aneurysm-related mortality were nil. Over a median follow-up of 9 months, two reinterventions were reported (3.6%). Conclusion: The robotic technique is safe and effective in treating splenic and renal artery aneurysms, and it should be considered as a valuable alternative to endovascular and open repair, although larger sample sizes and a longer-term follow-up are necessary to confirm such results.

Keywords: laparoscopic vascular surgery; robotic surgery; visceral aneurysm repair.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection of the studies according to the PRISMA Guidelines.

References

    1. Huang Z., Huang S., Huang Y., Luo R., Liang W. Comparison of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer resection: A systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front. Oncol. 2023;13:1273378. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1273378. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jiang Y., Liu Y., Qin S., Zhong S., Huang X. Perioperative, function, and positive surgical margin in extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal single port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2023;21:383. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03272-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alrajeb R., Zarti M., Shuia Z., Alzobi O., Ahmed G., Elmhiregh A. Robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 2023;34:1333–1343. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03798-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrionuevo P., Malas M.B., Nejim B., Haddad A., Morrow A., Ponce O., Hasan B., Seisa M., Chaer R., Murad M.H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the management of visceral artery aneurysms. J. Vasc. Surg. 2020;72:40S–45S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.05.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chaer R.A., Abularrage C.J., Coleman D.M., Eslami M.H., Kashyap V.S., Rockman C., Murad M.H. The Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines on the management of visceral aneurysms. J. Vasc. Surg. 2020;72:3S–39S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.01.039. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources